NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.
- Home
- Manufacturers Canon |Fujifilm |Leica |Nikon |Olympus |Panasonic |Pentax |Sigma |Sony |More...
- Reviews Pro Reviews |DSLRs |Mirrorless Cameras |P&S |Zoom Lenses |Prime Lenses |Mirrorless Lenses
- Photos Latest |Landscape |Nature |People |Travel |Sports |Animals |B&W |Sample Photos
- Forums New Posts |ViewFinder |Photo Critique |DSLRs |Compact System Cameras |Nature | Sports
- Video
- Classifieds
Copyright
©1996-2025 All Rights Reserved. ConsumerREVIEW.com, a business unit
of Invenda
Why do people refer to the Leica-S system as “medium format” when it plainly isn’t … it is only marginally bigger than full-frame 35mm as demonstrated by the 80% ‘crop-factor’ (which means the 45mm S-lens is equivalent to a 35mm lens on full-frame 35mm). If you want true medium format, have a look at the Hasselblad H5D-60 (which is technically exactly the same as the H4D-60, but with cosmetic differences). By thew ay, if anyone thinks I am pushing one system over the other, or rubbishing the Leica-S system, you’d be very very wrong. I use both systems … the Leica-S is my “35mm” system and the Hasselblad H4D-60 is my ‘medium format’ system. They are both great tools but the Leica-S is definitely not “medium format”.