Natural colour, extremely sharp.

Colour weak without flash

I blew up an image by 64 times, and there was SLIGHT graining.
Best film ever.

Similar Products Used:

The usual stuff.

Extremely fine grain, handles whites superbly (good for weddings!), also does a reasonable job under uncorrected fluorescent light

Fairly narrow latitude for print film, doesn't forgive underexposure. Weak colour rendition under overcast conditions, strongly benefits from fill in flash.

Slow speed by today's standards. Relatively expensive

90% of the time I use Fuji Superia 400 as a general purpose print film; for the remainder I use Reala for portraits/occasions where I intend using artifial light/flash. Sharpest print film I've used, although Agfa's ISO 50 comes close, with better saturation.

Similar Products Used:

The usual.

Great Colour Rendetion. No grain

Need to over expose .5 stop to get richest possible colour.

The best overall mixed lighting film I have ever used.

Customer Service

none

Similar Products Used:

kodak, agfa

Superb color reproduction. Best film on a sunny day.

None

The color is far more attractive than Kodak. Reproduction of sky and human skin color is unmatched by any other film.

Similar Products Used:

Kodak, Agfa, Konica

unmatched sharpness. Color is true as well as attractive. Seems to be the best in market.

Nil

Well, Kodak cannot provide equal products as Fuji Reala. When Reala is partnered with Fuji FDi D&P technology, the result will surprise anybody with eyes.

Similar Products Used:

Kodak various ISO100 films (incl professional ones)

Super fine grain.

Prints all seem dull and a bit dark.

Thei is a very fine grain film, and some prints seem OK, but in general they are all a little under exposed compared to Royal Gold film developed t the same time. I think what people say about the 100 ASA rating being a little high is true, so I may have missed the true potential. I will try rating it at ISO 64 or 80 to see if that helps, as everyone else seems to rave about it. Hopefully this will sort the problem out, although if this is not a 100 film, why do Fuji rate it as such?

Customer Service

Eh??

Similar Products Used:

Kodak Gold 100,200,400,800.
Kodak Royal Gold 100,200.

No weaknesses. Great color, with a good mix of detail and saturation in every situation I've shot it under.

not the VERY best color, and not the VERY best detail in it's class...

...but I'm REALLY nitpicking here

The best film I've found for overall use for everyday photography of any subject, person, thing, or landscape. Wonderfully flattering and balanced color saturation. A good amount of detail for a 100 ISO. Greens jump off the print, while maintaining good skin tones. Photos have wonderful depth in all colors, and are very (if slightly romantically) true to life.

How Fuji managed to create a film that almost perfectly balances contrast, color, detail, and saturation is beyond me.

The best overall daytime color film I've shot.

Customer Service

N/A

Similar Products Used:

Fuji NPS 160
Kodak Royal 100
Agfa Ultra 50
Agfa Optima 100, 200
Most consumer grade 100's

Brilliant
Perfect whites
Top saturation
Super sharpness
Perfect skin tones
Fine grain

What?

The film for weddings, social events etc. Anything involving people and vibrant colours. The standard in 100. can't have enough!

Customer Service

Top

Similar Products Used:

Kodak Royal 100
Agfa Optima
Konica

very smooth grain.
nice colors for nature and people.

you need to rate it at slower speed.
expensive.

Rate this film @ 80 or 50. rating it @ 100 will give you flat pictures. rate it at slower ISO, then devolop it normally (as 100). the pictures will come out overexposed, but the lab print will fix it. when you do that, you will get richer colors and details. try it.

Similar Products Used:

all Fuji and Kodak films

Superfine grain, Good saturation

None

The best all-around print film available.

Similar Products Used:

Kodak