Top Five Budget Zoom Lenses

Buying Guides Canon Featured Lenses Nikon Sigma Tamron

Lens Number Two:
Canon 70-200mm f/4L zoom lens user reviews

Canon 70-200mm f/4L Zoom Lens

Street Price: $650

I wanted to include this lens last year but shied away because it’s only compatible with Canon SLRs. But with well over 100 reviews from the PhotographyREVIEW.com community, a nearly perfect user rating and a very friendly price tag, I decided I decided it needed to be included this year. I consider a pro 70-200mm lens a prerequisite for almost any serious photography. Most 70-200mm pro lenses have big f/2.8 apertures and image stabilization systems. And they’ll hit your wallet hard – $1200 to over $2000! But the Canon 70-200mm f/4L gets you comparable optical performance for about $600. It’s also smaller and lighter than the f/2.8 lenses, which makes it a great pro zoom lens for backpackers and other photographers who appreciate a smaller, lighter camera bag.

If you aren’t a Canon owner or you’d just like an alternative, take a look at the Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 II EX DG Macro HSM and the Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD (IF) Macro zoom lenses. Both have a fast f/2.8 aperture and sell for well under $1000.

Read Canon 70-200mm f/4L Zoom Lens Reviews Compare Prices For Canon 70-200mm f/4L Zoom Lens Write A Canon 70-200mm f/4L Zoom Lens Review
 



Next – Zoom Lens Number One >>

Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC Superzoom Lens
Lens Five
Tamron SP AF17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di-II VC LD Zoom Lens
Lens Four
Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 DC HSM Ultra-wide Zoom Lens
Lens Three
Canon 70-200mm f/4L Telephoto Zoom Lens
Lens Two
Nikon AF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 VR II Zoom Lens
Lens One
About the author: Photo-John

Photo-John, a.k.a. John Shafer, is the managing editor of PhotographyREVIEW.com and has been since the site launched back in 1999. He's an avid outdoor enthusiast and spends as much time as possible on his mountain bike, hiking or skiing in the mountains. He's been taking pictures for ever and ever, and never goes anywhere without a camera.


Related Articles


NOTE: There are two ways to comment on our articles: Facebook or Wordpress. Facebook uses your real name and can be posted on your wall while Wordpress uses our login system. Feel free to use either one.

Facebook Comments:



Wordpress Comments:

  • frog says:

    I’m a bit surprised you did not list the Tokina 11-16 f/ 2.8. which I’d take the constant f/2.8 over the Sigma variable aperture any day. Not quite as wide or long as the Sigma but the performance and build quality touted in all the reviews I read more than make up for it. It will probably be my next lens for which I’ll probably trade in my tokiana 12-24 for.

  • Photo-John says:

    Personally, the Tokina appeals to me more too, Frog. But in the case of the Sigma 10-20mm, I went with the overwhelming number of reviews and visitors to the review page. Plus, the Sigma is much more affordable.

    Thanks for your comment, though. The more comments and alternative lens choices listed here the better. There’s no way my five lens picks can satisfy everyone. So the comments have the potential to make this article much more rich and diverse.

  • William says:

    Hi. I am upgrading to a Pentax K-k from a compact digital so I need help on lens selection. My question is, do these 5 lens fit on the K-7? Thanks IA, Bill.

  • Photo-John says:

    William-
    The Tamron and Sigma lenses should all be available with a Pentax mount. There might be some exceptions. Check the manufacturers sites to be sure. But in general, third-party lens makers sell lenses in all current camera mounts.

  • Phil says:

    The Tamron 18-250 creamed all the 18-200s you just mentioned and Tamron has since upgraded that lens with a version that goes all the way to 270 and has vibration control (VC). Check out tests in dpreview and pophoto. I can understand if these lenses are ranked first because of popularity among the uneducated masses who buy as a result of marketing, but for you to be recommending them without offering up better alternatives? This list isn’t bad but I think that each lens listed here might have competition that would have been critically better at competitive prices.

  • Photo-John says:

    Thanks for the comment, Phil. I’m happy to have people add their own favorites to this article. It’s impossible to make everyone happy or be entirely comprhensive with a “Top Five” article.

    As for the Tamron, I agree it’s an impressive lens. However, I tested the earlier 28-300mm VC version and although it was pretty good, I don’t think it’s better than the Canon or Nikon 18-200mm zooms, both of which I’ve used extensively. For what it’s worth, here’s a link to my Tamron 28-300mm VC lens review: http://www.photographyreview.com/reviews/blog/tamron-af28-300mm-f35-63-xr-di-vc-lens-review/

  • James says:

    I sadly bought the Nikon 18-200 VR II hoping it would be a great lens considering they raised the price of the Pre by over $150, This IS a good general Purpose walk about lens but it is not Pro Glass.It has a Zoom Lock which sadly is only good at 18mm and if you don’t use it the lens creep is unbearable. I have sent this back to Nikon Twice to replace the rubber on the Zoom and focusing ring whic they replace free but I cannot use this Lens when it is going back and forth to them. The Lens hood requires gaffer tap to keep it on for just the slightest bump will knock it off. Considering the $849 + Tax I paid for it I wish I had bought something else. Live and Learn, but I hope my review will help someone else who just might consider this Lens. I wish I would have waited and bought the 28/300 VR they came out with this year. Maybe that one would stay together.

  • Pingback: Top Five Budget Zoom Lenses | Foto

Leave a Reply to Photo-John Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*