Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia 400 Print Film
Fujifilm Fujicolor Superia 400 Print Film
[Aug 10, 2001]
Eddie Konno
Intermediate
Strength:
Fine grained film for outdoor
Weakness:
Not so good in indoor with poor lighting Printed at Kodak Royal print and came out great when shooting under blue sky. But it lacks in detail and graininess if you shoot them indoor with poor lighting. Some of close up with flash (indoor or outdoor in backlight situation) was good, so proper lighting is important for this film. Customer Service N/A Similar Products Used: Kodak Royal Gold 100 |
[Aug 07, 2001]
Christopher Mathews
Casual
Strength:
Inexpensive
Weakness:
Poor color reproduction I went through two rolls of this film and two rolls of Superia 100 while out on the windward and north shores of O'ahu. I was disappointed with both. Flowers, landscapes, temples, all suffered from oversaturated yellows and greens, and loss of detail in the highlights. Customer Service N/A Similar Products Used: Fujicolor Superia 100 |
[Aug 14, 2001]
Vinne Regemon
Intermediate
Strength:
inexpensive 4 pak, less than K*
Weakness:
no the smoothest tones I give the rating full stars because this is the best 400 speed consumer print film at the lowest prices from the big 2 film producers. When I first used this film about a year or two ago, I didn't like it. I had bought a 3.5-5.6 zoom lens and was getting unsatifactorily blurry pictures from having too low a speed for my shots. 400 speed film has cured this on the most part, but back then my Superia 400 shots looked grainy with very poor skin tones. They looked much worse than my Gold 100, which already isn't the finest grained film, but a decent film and I like the way enlargements look at 8x10. I was sure that the old Superia 400 would not look that way upon enlargement. Lately, although I have learned to live with Gold 100 as my staple film (it's a good standard film because it's cheap, sharp, has nice colors and smooth tones all over), I wanted to try Superia 400 again because I need the speed and was willing to give the film another shot. This new Superia 400 must be a new formulation because skin tones are much improved, but still not as good as my 100 film. It is a good compromise when I need the speed. Because of the low price and high color saturation, I have changed my opinion on this film. It has superb sharpness and tends to cling to some details more than others- especially wherever there is contrast. The edges of everything is sharp and although some skin tones are grainy, they are definetely not as blotchy as before- I have proof in the results. Of course, I still send this film to the same C41 processer as my Gold 100 film so that I know this is not a fluke. The colors are clean and it seems that red is a bit over saturated, but on the whole I like the look- sharp and slightly contrasty. If you didn't know any better, you'd not notice that much difference from a 100 speed film, other than the fact that there would be less blurry pictures from low speed shots and more control of depth of field. It also lets me stop down my zoom lens more for better lens performance. A great film from advanced technology. Similar Products Used: None |
[Aug 22, 2001]
pikabike
Intermediate
Strength:
Fast film,
Weakness:
Too grainy, I used this film for hand-held shooting on hikes where I didn't want to lug a tripod. I thought it would handle the high-altitude, mid-day contrast better than slide film. Similar Products Used: None |
[Dec 15, 1999]
Michael Goldfarb
Expert
Model Reviewed:
Fujicolor Superia 400
Strength:
Very nice film, with good sharpness and grain for the speed.
Weakness:
Not a problem, per se, but I prefer the look of Kodak's films. Fuji's colors tend to favor the blue/purple side of palette, while Kodak's emphasize the red/gold more. Good stuff, and a tad cheaper than equivalent Kodak film. A good choice for almost any camera, though for my own uses, I prefer Royal Gold 400. Customer Service don't know - nice website Similar Products Used: Kodak Gold 400, Royal Gold 400 |
[Dec 15, 1999]
Chris Butler
Expert
Model Reviewed:
Fujicolor Superia 400
Strength:
A terrific general-purpose film.
Weakness:
Too bright and contrasty for serious portraiture, but that's why Fuji makes NPS... I prefer Fuji films in general, but a real plus was WalMart's decision to use Fuji processors at their in-store 1 hour labs. These machines seem dialed into Fuji Superia 400 and give good results on Crystal Archive paper -- the most archival of type C print papers. Similar Products Used: Everything... |
[Nov 21, 1999]
Julius Mandelblat
Intermediate
Model Reviewed:
Fujicolor Superia 400
Strength:
Very fine grain for fast film. I did enlargements upto 25x30cm with good results. The colors are more real than Kodak Gold.
Weakness:
None Very good film. The best solution when you travel with single camera body. Similar Products Used: Kodak Gold 400 |
[Sep 28, 1999]
jannice osborne
Beginner
Model Reviewed:
Fujicolor Superia 400
Strength:
excellent collor, sharp pictures, competitively priced
Weakness:
none I use Fuji 400 all the time and have never had any problems. Customer Service n/a Similar Products Used: kodak |
[Sep 26, 1999]
Kristine Trent
Intermediate
Model Reviewed:
Fujicolor Superia 400
Strength:
Very sharp
Weakness:
none I use this film all the time. Best color and sharpness. To the gentleman in the below post that got bad color... I suggest you find somewhere else to get your pic's developed. (it's all in the printing!) Similar Products Used: Kodak 400 |
[Aug 25, 1999]
Denise Medeiros
Beginner
Model Reviewed:
Fujicolor Superia 400
Strength:
None
Weakness:
None Every single frame turned out perfect! Full of color. Not grainy. It is a great price and the company always has $$ off coupons. The best film I have used yet! Similar Products Used: Kodak 400, Fugifilm Super HQ 200 |