Konica Minolta XD-11/ XD-7 35mm SLRs
Konica Minolta XD-11/ XD-7 35mm SLRs
USER REVIEWS
[Oct 18, 2008]
uccemebug
Intermediate
Strength:
1. The meter
Weakness:
1. Double exposure
This camera is all about the meter. It is not a camera with a lot of bells and whistles, but its meter is far beyond anything else I've used. It excels in low light and remains capable through broad daylight an in tricky conditions of mixed and variable lighting.
Customer Service I was able to repair this camera myself when the two screws in the base plate mysteriously parted ways with the body. I have also had a camera repair shop have a look at the occasional double-exposure issues. I have not needed it serviced per se. Similar Products Used: Minolta SRT-101
|
[Nov 24, 2005]
johnr55
Intermediate
Strength:
Sensuous body design and execution, a true pleasure just to hold. Multimode--the first to have both aperture and shutter priority. Beautiful construction--has Minolta done anything to match it since? Solid feel combined with relative lightness, perfectly balanced with Minolta lenses. Durability--look how many are still in use! BTW the black models were black chrome, not just paint which defaced almost immediately.
Weakness:
The glove-soft leather and later, leatherette is badly prone to shrinkage. Look at the used examples and virtually all of them suffer from this. Many have had their covering replaced. I bought an XD-11 as a companion to an XG-M I already owned in the late 70's. Mine fortunately didn't have the real leather covering but the very soft leatherette. It was probably most sensuous-feeling and acting camera I ever owned, and I've had a bunch! The combination of the soft body covering with silky-smooth controls made so many other cameras I owned seem rough and crude by comparison. Though it was multimode I only used shutter priority very rarely. The centerweighted metering, which I was used to from Nikon, seldom failed to give me perfect slides, and then it was my fault. I enjoy(ed) Minolta MC and MD lenses; they didn't have the snap of Nikkor lenses but had their own character. The lenses were quite light and it was easy to load several in a bag and carry it. I particularly enjoyed the design of the top deck, as some SLR's I've owned seemed to catch on my clothes and anything else--not this one. The camera worked flawlessly for me through many dozens of rolls of film. I'd always found the Olympus OM's and Pentax ME's to be a little too small to hold comfortably; the XD was just that little bit larger and shaped a little differently and felt like it was made just for me. I kept that camera until I switched over to Leica R's for their lenses. It's true, the R series for many years shared the body casting of the XD-11, so it was a comfortable change. Had I been able to use R lenses on the XD I probably would have kept it. I still own two R5's and when I use them, I still remember the sexy little XD that is their cousin. Customer Service Never needed any. Similar Products Used: Minolta XG-M, multiple Leica SLR's from SL through R5, Nikon and Nikkormats too many to list (still have most of them!), Canon Pellix/FX/F1, several Miranda models, several Praktica models, couple of Exacta's. |
[Dec 03, 2004]
Craigboy
Intermediate
Strength:
- Affordable - Compact - DOF preview - MC/MD mount
Weakness:
- A very slight shutter lag - Timer lever is slightly poorly placed, takes getting used to I purchased my black-bodied XD7 after my X-700 sadly ceased to working. Since I'm currently studying a degree in photography, I quickly needed a cheap replacement that would take all the MC/MD lenses I had gathered over the past two years. Does cheap mean compromise? I don't think so. Minolta design and make some top quality cameras (did you know the Lecia R4 was based on the XD7/11?), and in my opinion the optics are among the best any system has to offer. I've used Nikkor and Carl Zeiss lenses and they don't blow me away in comparison, especially not for the price. Minolta optics are amazing quality and value for money, they also have a much smoother action and are more solid than any other optics I've used. Many other manufactures have also made lenses for the MC/MD mount, including Carl Zeiss Jena and Voigtlander. If saving money is less of an issue you could always try tracking down the illusive MD Rokkor range of lenses, f1.8 35mm MD W.Rokkor-X? f1.2 50mm MD Rokkor-X? f1.7 85mm MD Rokkor-X?... The XD7 itself? It’s a great looking camera yet I feel very comfortable walking around with it slung over my shoulder. Apart from an OM1, its the smallest SLR i've owned and its a pleaser to use. The viewfinder displays all the information you want and help for making quick adjustments; the camera also has a very smooth and almost ‘soft’ action. It works just like my X-700 and that’s all I wanted, its a camera I can use without knowing I'm using it. I shoot this camera fully manual so the aperture and shutter priority never get used, fortunately these functions are neatly tucked away so you can use this camera without them ever interfering. If you want a well designed, well built compact SLR that does everything a camera should do and has a large range of cheap, fast and very sharp lenses for pocket money, buy the XD7/11! Similar Products Used: Minolta X-700, Nikon OM2, Praktica BC1, Yashica FX-D, Olympus OM1-MD, Olympus OM2 |
[Feb 19, 2004]
Kenshin
Intermediate
Strength:
Full Manual and durability.
Weakness:
Film can get caught sometimes, but fairly easily corrected. This camera is stunning, I defy anyone to say otherwise. Full manual or auto or semi-auto depending on your needs. Absolutely amazing, I have only had it for about two and half months now, but I have already had the photos developed and published in a Formula One magazine. This is truly a world class camera and one of the best I have ever had the pleasure to use! Buy it if you haven't got one. Customer Service Not great, seeing as they gave up on the XD7. Similar Products Used: Minolta XD's, Leica lenses, md lenses, olympus IS series. |
[Jul 11, 2003]
brent robinson
Intermediate
Strength:
Flexibility and ease of use.
Weakness:
Durability, considering the age The XD-11 has shutter priority, aperature priority, and manual. It can be used without battery. It is an excellent camera for the price. Similar Products Used: Nikon Nikkormat |
[Mar 07, 2003]
Leo J Serne
Expert
Strength:
Multimode, right balance, DOF, 2nd measurement at diaphragm closure, shutterspeed even up to 1/2000. And all other aspects mentioned in the review!
Weakness:
none My first lightweight multimode SLR. A fine well balanced SLR. Accompanied with first series MD (e.g. RF 250 and 35mm 1.8)lenses always a fine set. Better travelcompanion than other Minolta's due to relatively light weight. Silent shutter and dampened mirror. M A and S mode, all very accurate. Durability and reliabilty better than Leica R series. Interchangable screens hard to find but worth to look out for. A smooth item this is, highly recommended. Customer Service via third parties, Minolta does not service XD anymore. For parts look for defect camera's! Similar Products Used: MF; XM, XE, SRT 101 AF; Dynax 9 and 7 |
[Feb 10, 2003]
Peter Huppertz
Intermediate
Strength:
The camera.
Weakness:
Nothing. Just deceptively simply, nothing. This is what any 35mm SLR should be like, period. Possibly the best Japanese SLR ever. All the bells and whistles, yet simple layout. Reasonably small and not too heavy - yet built like a tank, extremely rugged and standing up to almost every abuse you can think of. Almost? Yes: soaking it in 1.5 litres of genuine Coca Cola will break it - but not beyond repair, as I found out after I owned one for 10 years. I still have that one, as well as another (which hasn't had the coke treatment, and as such has yet to break), and I love them. Couple that with Minolta's superior MC and MD lenses (almost German) and happiness is a loaded XD7. After using it for 24 years, there is nothing that I can think of that I would want differently to an SLR - this is as close to a perfect product as it gets. It is so good that if Minolta (and Nikon) would have continued on this level, they would've been out of business by now - nobody would've needed a new camera anyway after buying an XD7 (or an F3, for that matter). True 5 star stuff in both value and overall ratings. Did I say that this is a good camera? ;-) Customer Service No idea, never needed them (the Coke-soaked one was lovingly restored by the same local specialist who sold it to me 24 years ago - but as the camera is no longer serviced, I'd say "crap". Similar Products Used: Minolta SR-T101, Minolta XE1 (still owned), XM (still looking for one...), Dynax 7000 (offloaded), Nikon F3 (almost as perfect as the XD7) Canon AV1, AE1, A1 (if they had been mine, I'd have sold them |
[Nov 04, 2002]
Shirish
Intermediate
Strength:
Solid, reliable workhorse. Smooth mechanicals, unglamorous name brand (nobody interested in stealing this one!), never let me down.
Weakness:
No spot/multi-spot metering, body coupling for aperture sensor can get worn after 15-20 years of use One of the best electromechanical cameras, period. Have owned it since 1981, thousands of pictures, the only time it went in to Minolta was in 1996 for a CLA, three months before they stopped servicing it. Customer Service Never needed any Similar Products Used: Canon AE1, Canon TLb, Olympus OM1 |
[Aug 27, 2002]
CaptainGrump
Intermediate
Strength:
Depth-of-field preview, eyepiece shutter, ability to work with dead batteries. A, S, M and Programmed automation. Cable release socket. Real pentaprism instead of penta-mirror viewfinder.
Weakness:
I'll echo the other users' complaints of the covering's shrinkage. But then, that's only cosmetic. It's been my workhorse camera since I bought it in 1978. The XD-11 was the last full-featured non-pro manual camera that Minolta produced before going to their innovative AF, but since my lenses were not compatible, I stuck with my manual focus. Similar Products Used: Nikon, Mamiya |
[Jun 29, 2002]
Suttisak
Intermediate
Strength:
Solid, compact, reliable, shutter priority mode, DOF
Weakness:
Vibration, No mirror lock up, DOF preview button need to be held while viewing the change. Solid construction, compact. Smaller than XE-7 and XK and more solid than X-700. It was the first camera with shutter priority, ever. Vertical traveling shutter make smooth feeling when depress the button. However, the the mirror flip up cause too much vibeation sometimes, this might be because of its small size. No mirror lock up, so the vibration is still there. It has DOF preview button but you have to depress and hold it to see. Not like SRT-101 or X-700 when you depress the button once and let go to see the change, depress again to release it. Make your hand free to change the aperture while viewing. Similar Products Used: XK, X-700. XE-7, SRT-101, SR-1 |