Pentax SMCP-FA 645 45mm f/2.8 Medium Format
Pentax SMCP-FA 645 45mm f/2.8 Medium Format
USER REVIEWS
[Dec 04, 2003]
Vince Varnas
Professional
Strength:
Sharp No distortion Smooth manual focusing Reasonably fast auto focus Push/pull auto/manual focus ring Price
Weakness:
None This is an excellent lens! It is sharp at all aperatures. Virtually no distortion. Crisp/excellent contrast. I compared it to the SMCP-FA 75mm, f/2.8, SMCP-FA 45-85mm, f/4.5 and the SMCP-A 55mm, f/2.8 lenses and found it to be just as sharp as they were at all aperatures, corner-to-corner. Perhaps Pentax has made some improvements since 2001/2000 in this lens or maybe sample variation is a problem. Customer Service Unknown Similar Products Used: SMCP-FA 75mm, f/2.8 SMCP-FA 150mm, f/2.8 SMCP-FA 45-85mm, f/4.5 SMCP-A 55mm, f/2.8 |
[Aug 17, 2000]
Andrea Solmi
Expert
Strength:
comes with its hood; not bulky; well finished and solid; distortion ok
Weakness:
not so sharp; colors less vivid then i thought I was quiete disappointed with this wide-angle; I expected it was more sharp and contrasty than it is. In my opinion is one of the less performing lens for my Pentax 645 AF. Customer Service never called Similar Products Used: other Pentax 645 lenses |
[Mar 04, 2001]
Wilson Chow
Casual
Strength:
Light weight, small size. Reasonable price, only around US$500.
Weakness:
None The distortion is hardly found and corner sharpness is still very good even at F4. Customer Service No experience Similar Products Used: 6008 EL 50/4. |
[May 10, 2001]
Patrik Bjorklund
Intermediate
Strength:
A very lightweight lens and is delivered with a scalloped lenshood.
Weakness:
The sharpness could be little better. The lens has good value but could be sharper and crispier. It is a lens that is very easy to carry around because of the low weight. The diffraction is not so noticeable at f22 compared to other lenses at the same focal length. Customer Service No. Similar Products Used: Hasselblad FE 50mm f2.8. |
[May 21, 2001]
D. King
Intermediate
Strength:
Fine-Excellent optics
Weakness:
Optics could be perhaps a little better It's pretty tough to beat this lens for scenic landscape and waterscape pictures. Composition using the 645n viewfinder is a breeze, and tuning a polarizer's effects is easy. I've taken enlargements to 16X20 with nice sharpness (using Kodak VC 160 film). This is actually my favorite lens to use with the 645n. I also meter my 4X5 camera with a 90/8 lens mounted and 645n with the 45/2.8 does an excellent job in this capacity as well. In the wide angle area is where I've found the greatest advantage in terms of resolution and sharpness at bigger enlargements of medium format vs small format (35mm) lenses. There really is no comparison when using color reversal film. Actually this is probably true at all focal lengths. Customer Service Haven't needed Similar Products Used: Nikkor 35/2.5 "E" |