Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX Aspherical HSM 35mm Zoom
Sigma 17-35mm f/2.8-4 EX Aspherical HSM 35mm Zoom
[Jan 31, 2001]
Neil Mitchell
Expert
Strength:
Sharp, excellent colour reproduction, well built (despite the plastic feel).
Weakness:
Not f2.8 throughout the zoom range. Nothing this good at this price. In fact nothing this good at double the price. Customer Service n/a Similar Products Used: none |
[Feb 06, 2001]
Russell
Expert
Strength:
this is the great lens
Weakness:
the lens could you have to take it off to put the cap on. and it fills cheap but for the money.... for that one lens you use once in a Blue Moon this is a great buy. just something handy to keep in the back for those super wide shots and for the money you can't complain.... Customer Service none yet.... Similar Products Used: tamron 28-300, |
[Feb 12, 2001]
Mark Booth
Professional
Strength:
Lets you get a reasonable wide angle on a D30(all focal lengths x 1.6)
Weakness:
82mm filter size(cost a fortune!)...Should be constant f2.8!! Having purchased a Canon D30(with a focal length increase of x1.6),The prohibitive cost of Canons own wide angle zoom soon pointed me in the direction of Sigma`s little beauty,Boy am I glad!Cracker of an optic to own!! Customer Service Fingers crossed(shhhhh) Similar Products Used: Cosina/Vivitar 19mm-35mm f3.5 |
[Feb 26, 2001]
Sanders Wong
Intermediate
Strength:
- Cheapest 17mm zoom on the market
Weakness:
- Rotating focus ring during AF This is the dream ultra-wide angle lens of poor people like me. The optic is wonderful and the price makes it extremely attractive for EOS users. For Nikon fans, why not trying the 18-35/3.5-4.5ED?! Well, as per my experience, please do try the lens before you actually pay. Customer Service Mine have problem with its AF. When shooting landscape, the AF stopped between 1 & 1.5m mark. I then went to exchange for another one, guess what?! I've tried 4 of those and all shared the same problem on the following EOS bodies I've been testing on: 30/300/100/1V/5/50/3 & D30. Eventually, I've give up the fine optics and 17mm to trade for the Canon EF 20-35/3.5-4.5. Luckily, the shop owner agreed to exchange it for me. (remember, here is HK, not US) Similar Products Used: EF 20-35mm/3.5-4.5 |
[Mar 10, 2001]
FRED MIRANDA
Expert
Strength:
Well built (EX finish)
Weakness:
Filters of 82mm This is one of the best lenses Sigma ever made. Customer Service Never used (good sign) Similar Products Used: 17-35L |
[Mar 10, 2001]
Yvonne Shojda
Professional
Strength:
Well built and light
Weakness:
82mm filter size (not a big issue) This is an excellent lens. Very sharp even at 2.8, very competitive price and well corrected. Similar Products Used: 17-35L |
[Mar 16, 2001]
Karl
Intermediate
Strength:
Wide angle zoom range
Weakness:
Must switch to manual focus Great Value. Impressively sharp even at wide open (a little shaper a stop or two down). As sharp as some of the best Canon lenses (have not compared to Canon 17-35). A great companion with the 28-135IS on a Canon D30. I would not recommend some other Simga lenses, but this one works great. Similar Products Used: Canon 20mm and Canon 28-135IS |
[Mar 26, 2001]
James Maloney
Intermediate
Strength:
not too heavy
Weakness:
focus ring too easy to turn but use a/f most of the time anyway...! this lens is great value for money considering the nikon equivalent in australia is approx. 3 times the retail price.great optics for landscapes or any photography that requires this size lens. i have found that it spends most of it's life on my f100 for general pics, especially rainforests & landscapes. you can't go wrong with this lens, with a fast speed and good glass... Customer Service n/a Similar Products Used: nikon |
[May 03, 2001]
William Hickok
Intermediate
Strength:
Price
Weakness:
Motor Drive Purchased new one year ago. Loved the results using RVP. No issues with flare or wash out at 17mm. Focus ring is a bit cheap feeling and the zoom ring should be coated to make it a little more comfortable. Overall great until the HSM motor went out. Sigma was very responsive getting it fixed, but still, after only six months and 30 odd rolls, there should not have been a problem. Overall I love the value, hope it holds up.... Similar Products Used: Canon 17-35L |
[May 15, 2001]
Charilaos Goussias
Expert
Strength:
low price, light-weight, excellent contrast and colour rendition. Silent and fast auto-focus(HSM for Canon EOS).
Weakness:
Flare, without the hood. A bit soft at f2.8. Vignetting with more than 2 filtres. Cokin fltres unusable at 17mm, unless adapter is oriented horizontally: no colour gradient filters! Depth-of-field scale not very usable at long focal lengths. 82mm fltres cost a fortune. Focusing ring too soft. Important barel distortion at 17mm: too bad for architecture, not a problem with landscapes. Highly recommended. The price tag makes you overlook the shortcomings mentionned. Great for landscape photography. Similar Products Used: Canon EF 20-35mm |