Nikon AF-S Zoom-Nikkor 28-70mm f/2.8 IF-ED 35mm Zoom
Nikon AF-S Zoom-Nikkor 28-70mm f/2.8 IF-ED 35mm Zoom
USER REVIEWS
[Dec 06, 2008]
CooDeville
Expert
Strength:
Accurate and fast focusing, color saturation, shaprness.
Weakness:
None I've had my eye on this lens for a long time now and finally found a used one in B&H. Few and far between do you find any there. I've been inquiring about it at the Used department for at least 5 years now. This timethe salesman finally had one that was a store demo. Ironically, just as I decided to purchase it, another customer who was standing next to me asked for it as well.
Similar Products Used: 35 - 70 F/4 - 5.6 Zeiss lens |
[Nov 01, 2005]
lifanus
Expert
Strength:
Build Sharpness Contrast Autofocus speed Quietness
Weakness:
Weight Filter Thread Size Simply the best standard zoom lens, Sharp image, Excellent contrast, Ultra quite and fast AF-s |
[Mar 27, 2004]
normyip
Professional
Strength:
Build Fast Auto-focus
Weakness:
As explained above in the review. I take a lot of wedding photography in Hong Kong, and before buying the Nikong ED-IF AF-S 28-70mm lens, I was using Nikon 35-70 F2.8 as my main lens. After reading glowing reviews about the 28-70mm convinced me that it was about time I got this lens. I started using this lens as my 'main' lens on one of my F100's and kept the 35-70mm lens on my back-up camera. After photographing about 12 weddings and reviewing the images, I started to notice that my photographs had lost some of it's brilliance and sharpness as taken on the new lens. Not really convinced and thinking it was my imagination, I decided to finally make a head to head test with equal setting of film, flash, etc. Everything identical except the lens. And the results were shocking. The 35-70 came out brighter and sharper than the 28-70. And we all know how expensive the 28-70mm lens is. I'm saddened to know that I paid such a bundle for this lens that doesn't match the consumer line 35-70mm. So strangely enough, this new more expensive lens will now be on my 'backup' camera. Customer Service N/A Similar Products Used: Nikon 35-70mm F2.8 Nikon 80-200mm F2.8 |
[Feb 19, 2004]
tre44iou1
Professional
Strength:
Very sharp,Top quality,Solid as a rock.
Weakness:
None This lens is amazingly sharp with nice contrast, and rich color reproduction. This lens is the best you can get. Love it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Similar Products Used: Nikon 17-35mm f/2.8D ED-IF AF-S, Nikon 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D ED VR AF |
[Dec 07, 2003]
graham price
Professional
Strength:
Very sharp even wide open. High contrast. Seems to work really well with Nikon TTL flash (don't ask me why I've had problems with other lenses)
Weakness:
Not really weaknesses, just reality of a big lump of glass-expense & weight I've owned most latest Nikon primes and zooms up to 200mm at one time or another. I thought that the prime D range would have to be better than ED zooms. This lens is the sharpest I've tested wide open. Better than my 85 and 50 primes. Stopped down it becomes exceptional. I am currently selling my remaining prime lenses on ebay. This is the best lens I have owned. Customer Service Nikon UK frighteningly slow, but helpful Similar Products Used: Most Nikon Ds and EDs up to 200mm |
[Nov 27, 2003]
Carl Feather
Professional
Strength:
Build quality, focuses fast but not accurately
Weakness:
Poor resolution, limited focus range This lens is greatly overpriced for what it does and how it performs. The lens I bought has terrible corner resolution until f/8, at which point it performs like my 50mm f/1.8 at f/2.8. The lens is extremely heavy and well built, but that's about as much good as I can say about it. I have sent the lens back to Nikon and asked for one that lives up to its price. Pass on this lens and buy the 35-70 f/2.8 and a 28 or 24mm prime. You'll save money and have sharper images, less weight in the bag. Customer Service Still waiting Similar Products Used: Nikkor 28-70 f/3.5-4.5, a much better lens; 35-70 f/2.8, a far superior lens for 1/3 the price! |
[Nov 20, 2003]
L Chan
Casual
Strength:
* A piece of nice glass produced by Nikon * Fast and slient AF
Weakness:
* Bulky * Expensive This len is amazingly sharp with nice contrast, and rich color reproduction. The len looks bulky (esp. with the hood), and some time scare people off when making snap-shoot. AF-S offers fast and accurate auto-focusing with minimum noise. The handling is good for zooming and manual-override of AF. Customer Service - Similar Products Used: Nikon AF 80-200 f2.8ED Nikon AF-S 17-35 f2.8ED Nikon AF 24-120 3.5-4.5D Nikon AF 35-70 3.5-4.5 Sigma AF 18-35 |
[Apr 29, 2003]
Russell Dean
Intermediate
Strength:
Build quality and excellent picture producing lens.
Weakness:
Price. But then again this is a pro lens. This lens is wonderful producing nice tack sharp pictures with great contrast. This lens is on the expensive side, but if you are a profectionist with desiring flawless pictures, then this lens is for you. Build quality is excellent. Customer Service Have not used. Similar Products Used: Nikon 80-200 f/2.8 Nikon 300 f/4 Nikon 35 f/2 |
[Apr 17, 2003]
xulec
Beginner
Strength:
Fast. Solid. Use the lens with Nikon D1 for about a year, it's good for almost everyting. The sharpness and contrast they achieve in B&W mode is amazing. Please note that D1 has already got a 1.5 focal factor built in. Put this lens on a film camera, and you get the image quality you've always dreamed of. Similar Products Used: AF-S 17-35mm AF-S 80-200mm |
[Feb 17, 2003]
Frans Leerdam
Intermediate
Strength:
Good balance on D1X Excellent glass, very very sharp.
Weakness:
Besides of the high price in Europe: None weaknesses. Very nice lens in combination with the 17-35/2.8 AFS. My most used lens on my D1X. My first lens I bought and really love this. Very nice D.O.F. Built like a tank, feels excellent on D1X. Very well balanced. Similar Products Used: Nikor 17-35/2.8 AFS Nikor 70-200/2.8 AFS VR IF ED Nikor 60 micro/2.8 Nikor 50/1.4 Nikor 300/4 |