Nikon AF 70-210mm f/4-5.6D Zoom-Nikkor 35mm Zoom

Nikon AF 70-210mm f/4-5.6D Zoom-Nikkor 35mm Zoom 

DESCRIPTION

Popular mid-range zoom, suitable for many applications, including portraiture and travel photography. Autofocus for ease-of-use. Focus down to 46 inches.

USER REVIEWS

Showing 11-20 of 46  
[Sep 13, 2009]
starriderrick
Intermediate

Strength:

The best budget priced telephoto zoom lens out there.
A very good zoom.
Price.
Push / Pull zoom...silky smooth,fast.
Decent bokeh and very good build quality / all metal body..
Inexpensive, very fast AF(good for sports) excellent sharpness and contrast.
Distortion: very low at all focal lengths.
Image quality

On the topic of Sharpness: Decent wide open, but stop down to F8 and you'll just make images that cut through anything, very very sharp.

Weakness:

Push pull zoom can suck in dust.
Not a lense for Manual Focus work.Clumsy focus ring is very sensitve, out front.
The filter size is 67mm which is kind of weird for a Nikon lens.
A heavy lense.(this is a strength for me) may not be for some

This is an all metal prosumer zoom lens that nikon made during the mid 90s. It is of the the highest build quality and quite robust / heavy.With a minimum focus distance of 4 feet..I have found through experimentation,... it can be used for quasi macro photos as well.
A very good lens:Well made ,TACK SHARP,impressive image quality.You get this lens for a steal these days.
It can compete well with other options in the $500+ range today. If you're considering it just save yourself the time and pick one up. You won't regret it.

Just remember... not for everyone...A fairly heavy lense.

Highly recommended for an outdoor photographer on a budget.Just an overall great lens!

Rick




Customer Service

Not needed

Similar Products Used:

Tokina 75-300
Sigma 28-300
Nikkor 55-200

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[Mar 11, 2007]
bensondjy
Intermediate

Strength:

Good Sharpness at wide open, Unbeatable sharpness from f8~f16.
Super Fast Focusing.
Good color and contrast.
C/P Value.
Compare to F2.8 80~200, the price is unbeatable.
Light but metal built.

Weakness:

not as fast as f2.8.

I just used it about 2 month. I fully agree with kenwell's review. Razor Sharp, good color and contrast, fast focusing.

Plus, it is light. Pro Built. Metal used.

I actually like the pull zoom. direct feeling.

I sold my sigma apo dg 70-300mm and nikkor 70-300mm ED. Comparing them with my 70-210mm D. they are just like toys.

Similar Products Used:

Sigma 70-300mm APO DG
Nikon 70-300mm ED

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Feb 16, 2007]
piotr_82
Intermediate

Strength:

- Optical quality - EXTREMELY SHARP !!!, CONTRASTY and well toned colors (espiecially when stopped down)
- Built quality - very SOLID and DURABLE - metal and glass,
- Good focal lenght for portraits, wildlife and outdoor shooting,
- Great balace with N80 (and similar SLR bodies),
- Still fast aperture, even handheld,
- PRICE and QUALITY - great related to each other!!!

Weakness:

- can be a bit soft below f/5.6
- quite heavy due to metal and glass construction - have to know if you prefer weight or durability
- front element rotating while focusing,
- focusing distance quite big - not a macro lens ...
- needs a fill-in-flash in a dim light conditions, especially with longer focal lenghts

I bought this lens as a bargain on the internet auction (allegro) about a year ago. Wanted to have a medium focal lenght zoom lens with good optics and solid, metal construction - this one was the best choice I have made and still left my pocket with some money! Optically I am very satisfacted with the results, it gives a SHARP, CONTRASTY pictures and natural color tones, especially when stopped down to f/8 or more! It still gives very good results handheld when using ISO400 film. From f/3.5 - 5.6 it is a bit soft, espiecially in the corners and sometimes in the center of a frame but stopped down and no softness is visible! Great choice fot a wildlife photos, portraits (with Nikon A2 filter that is always on my lens it gives really fantastic skin tone and slightly warmed backgroud - looks great to me!) and narrow landscape shots!
Solid metal construction is quite heavy but I do not have to worry about breaking the lens in my photo bag or a backpack. Never use tripoid but suppose to get even better overall results with one! Usually works in AF mode that is a bit slow in my non-D version, but still precise and suitable to my needs (portraits and animals do not need a super-fast focusing, nor do landscape scenes). Focusing ring works smoothly, zooming barrel too (it`s a push-pull zoom lens - shouldn`t need a lot of time to get used to it ; right now seems to me that this type is even better than a standard one). Distortion is acceptable but I try to avoid straight lines as a main motive on my scenes. Flare can be a problem when you get a direct sun into the lens - need to think about it when shooting! I always shoot this lens with a NH-23 Nikon metal lens hood that seems to solve this problem! Balanes very nicely with my N80 and MB16 Battery pack - no reasons to complain about it. Front element rotates while focusing so polarisers can be a bit demanding - personally don`t have a 62mm polariser so far ;)
Overall, it`s a GREAT performing lens with a - let me call it a "sub-pro" quality - very good optics, built with metal and glass which is not very common solution in todays Nikon lens. If you need such a focal lenght, want to get a stunning results and still keep a money in your pocket - this is a MUST! (not so hard to find a second-hand one on an auction as a bargain!). I can recommend it as a second lens in every photo bag!

Customer Service

Never need one so far ...

Similar Products Used:

Nikkor 35-135 f/3.5-4.5., Nikkor 20mm f/2.8D, Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D Nikon N80 camera body with MB 16 Baterry Pack, Nikon SB-600 flash

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jan 11, 2006]
hinze
Intermediate

Strength:

Fast as lightning razor sharp good contrast good color

Weakness:

none at this price

I bought this lens becouse i read kenrockwell's review of it and I have to say that i fully agree with his opinion in any way. The Nikkor 70-210 AF-D is unbeatable in sharpness!!!! I've seen more expensive lenses (third party and nikkor) which are not half the sharp this lens is. When you first whatch an image out of the camera (d50/70 in my case) you simply cannot belive it! razor sharp brilliant contrast and colors - what else can you say... oh yes the af is a real sprinter! I had to get used to the push pull mechanism first but you get into it in minutes and it is noth that bad compared to the ones you turn. I think i never sell this lense again. like the guy bevore said - the best lense you can get for your nikon gear at this price and this quality! kudos nikon!

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Dec 11, 2005]
Christiano
Professional

Strength:

ALL...... its pro made.....(made in japan) may one say it i s a pro lens for a amateur price..or 95 % close to this fact? (another sleeper is the 28-85 and the 28-70 too.!)

Weakness:

too slow at the 210 5,6 end...BUT still fast..?!!

Probably the best investment you can do for your Nikon analogue or digital gear for the moment,the only rival is the Nikkor 28-200,and of course a little better the 80-200 and best of all the 70-200 BUT at a very very different price but not extremely different when it comes to the quality of the end result> true pic quality. This Lens is able to make very good prints and sharp pics with good resolution and details,a little flat at the 210 end and lacking a bit of contrast,but very very close to pro results.I use it mostly when its a clear good day and sunny,and use it as well with my SB 600 flash and Nikon D1 H and even with my oold Nikon F2 ! I agree with many that this lens is very responsive and fast and for my PJ work its fantastic capable to solve the newpapers need for good sharp sports pic and other fast action pics.No probs whatsoever! Of course its Not a hgh end lens BUT darn too close for little money,remember to put a good filter (62 mm) in front.; i use Rodenstock UV.If you can find it used .Buy it. Highly recomandable.

Customer Service

nope

Similar Products Used:

many in the 70-200 end..sigma canon nikon..

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jul 31, 2004]
nevardmedia
Expert

Strength:

Notes from using on a digital Nikon D70 DSLR: Optical and build quality-wize, better than the newer 75-300 'Nikkors?'. My results comparing (unfairly?) to prime lens Nikkors in this range.... Much to my surprize; good contrast and saturation at all apertures, only falling off slightly wide open at 210mm. Sharpness pretty good at all zoom settings (a tad weaker at 210mm). Just stopping down half a stop from wide open increases sharpness markedly a 210mm end (a small amount of USM in Photoshop makes full aperture very usable however!). No noticeable light fall off even wide open (bearing in mind a DSLR only uses the centre 2/3rds of a 35mm frame - an advantage). Chromatic aberration well controlled, you have to look quite hard for it even at wider apertures. Nice bokeh for a zoom, with little to no 'directional' or 'patterning' effects. At apertures from around f7.1 and smaller the results surprizing compare very well to my 85mm & 135mm Nikkor primes. Secondhand price good.

Weakness:

None really for spec and price, just the slower aperture when you need the speed at 210mm end. Keep those prime lenses for dull days when this lens is too slow.

Older design solid AF Nikkor, covering a fairly undemanding but useful 70-210mm tele range. Bargain price - probably because most consumers want a zoom to cover 12-600mm all in one lens!

Customer Service

Never needed.

Similar Products Used:

A borrowed a 75-300mm ED Zoom Nikkor. Nikkor primes in this range. Tamron 80-210 (nasty).

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jun 22, 2004]
olegv
Expert

Strength:

Good sharpness and contrast wide open across entire zoom range. Fast AF.

Weakness:

Push pull zoom, loose focus ring - not for manual focus fans.

It seems to be the best AF-D consumer zoom. I guess Nikon discontinues it to shift customers to much costly F2.8 zooms. Bought it used for my D70 after being disappointed by AF 70-300 ED (sharpness in ok but contrast is below average, especially at the short end).

Similar Products Used:

AF 70-300 ED AF-S 24-85 AF 18-35 AF 50/1.8 Sigma 105/2.8 macro

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Nov 09, 2003]
Mark78
Intermediate

Strength:

Excellent build quality (really robust) sharp & nice colors cheap

Weakness:

None for the price

I bought this lens used from eBay at a very good price, its a very good lens by Nikkor, pretty sharp and nice colors, the building quality is perfect , feels really solid with all metal body and mount, Auto focus is fast enough (at least for me) and the zoom range is good also without any noticeable distortion. this lens is excellent deal for the price.

Customer Service

Not needed yet

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Nov 02, 2002]
tonybell7
Intermediate

Strength:

Price Great for portraits Great construction Flexible range

Weakness:

A little heavy but not compared to f2.8's! Zoom creep...or DASH!

Overall, I like this lens. I've found that I have no problem getting very sharp photos anywhere from 135mm and shorter. The closer to the long end, the softer the shots but what can you possibly expect for this price. I'm currently using it on an N70 and the combination is a little heavy so hiking with it can wear you out. And the only other problem I have with it is zoom creep....if you can call it "creep"...it's more like a dash, it slides out in a HURRY.

Customer Service

n/a

Similar Products Used:

Soligar 95-310 manual focus (incredibly sharp...I may just have a great sample) Nikon 28-105 (makes the 70-210 a little obsolete for me)

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jul 05, 2002]
JJavier
Intermediate

Strength:

Robust Color rendition

Weakness:

Being just a consumer grade telezoom, it's bulky and heavy. Zoom slips.

My last attempt to find a good portable AF telezoom. I like hiking, not carrying stuff. Since the 80-200 f2,8 is a dam*ed heavy monster for me and the 80-200 f4,5-5,6 looked like a plastic toy, I tried this lens. Man, I never really enjoyed it: nothing's wrong with it, but optics and handling aren't either exciting. After several hours carrying it, 600 gr is too much weight for such an ordinary performance. Finally, I parted with it and replaced it by the better built 75-150 or one prime. I take less pictures, but I'm more satisfied with them.

Similar Products Used:

Cosina AF 70-210 f4,5-5,6 Nikon E 75-150 f3,5 Sigma Macro 180 f5,6 Nikkor AF-D 85 f1,8 Nikkor 135 f3,5 Nikkor 200 f4

OVERALL
RATING
3
VALUE
RATING
3
Showing 11-20 of 46  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

photographyreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com