Sigma 300mm f/2.8 APO EX 35mm Primes
Sigma 300mm f/2.8 APO EX 35mm Primes
USER REVIEWS
[Feb 19, 2006]
Photos by Blackwolf
Professional
Strength:
Solid build, fast autofocus, works great with 2x teleconvertor
Weakness:
none that i have found Very surprised by the quality of workmanship put into the lens. Autofocus works fast and accurate. Used with Sigma 2x tele, showed no weakness of edges or vignetting. Lens hood very well built and easy to attach. Use for wildlife photography in Alaska, and is built rugged enough for back country hiking. Similar Products Used: Canon ef 300mm 5.6 Sigma 50-500mm 4.0-6.3 Canon fd 500mm 4.5 Canon fd 300mm 4.5 |
[Feb 20, 2002]
Mark
Professional
Strength:
Fast AF, light compared to many other 300/2.8s, very good quality optically
Weakness:
Lens hood falls off at the drop of a hat. The paper I worked for recently got one of these as a backup 300/2.8, and I''ve been pleasantly surprised with the quality of this lens. Being a third-party lens, I expected the worst, but I would be hard-pressed to find a difference between this lens and our Nikon 300 in a side-by-side comparison. It''s just as bright, sharp and contrasty as the Nikon, and autofocuses nearly as fast. I''ve taken it to a few basketball games this winter, and every time it''s performed well for me. After some bad experiences a few years ago, I''d given third-party lenses a wide berth, but this one''s clearly a solid performer. Similar Products Used: various manual and autofocus 300/2.8s and 400/2.8s by Canon and Nikon, a really crummy Tokina 300/2.8 MF |
[Jul 28, 2000]
nico
Expert
Strength:
Good quality and well build. No need to fiddle with switches in order to change from manual to AF. Great optical quality. fast and silent AF, even with converters.
Weakness:
tripod collar is sticky to rotate. vignetting when used with converters. Sigma should back their lenses with a longer warrenty. Customer Service Effective but slow in NZ Similar Products Used: Nikon, Sigma and Tokina |
[Jun 26, 2001]
Mark Roberts
Expert
Strength:
Superb image quality. Fast. Versatile.
Weakness:
Big and heavy (like all 300/2.8 telephotos) After becoming frustrated with the limitations of my old 400/5.6 I decided to spend the money to get a fast telephoto. A 300/2.8 seemed a good compromise as far as size/weight/cost were concerned and I thought that a high quality teleconverter would allow access to longer focal lengths and give me a little more versatility for my money. For Pentax autofocus my choices were limited to Pentax and Sigma and, as much as I'd love to get the Pentax FA-300/2.8, my budget limited me to the Sigma. (Well truthfully, my budget limited me to not getting either but I decided I deserved a birthday present!) Customer Service None needed yet Similar Products Used: Sigma 400/5.6 AF |