Olympus OM-Zuiko 50mm f2.0 Macro 35mm Primes
Olympus OM-Zuiko 50mm f2.0 Macro 35mm Primes
USER REVIEWS
[Feb 08, 2020]
alvarodiaz
Strength:
I use it for doing portraits with a full frame mirrorless cam. At f2 it's still very sharp and contrasty. Stunning quality glass. Weakness:
A little bulky and heavy compared to other 50's I have but well balanced after all. Price Paid: 400
Purchased: Used
Model Year: 1980
|
[Mar 23, 2011]
Furiosi
Professional
Strength:
Holds highlights well.
Weakness:
It's a large lens (for the Zuiko line).
I agree with reviewers who describe this lens has having very pleasing qualities. It renders skin tones nicely, holds highlights well, and has very pleasing bokeh. In fact, I prefer the "look" of pictures taken with this lens to my pre-asph Leica Summilux, a lens I have used for years and simply love. However, I don't think the Zuiko 50/2 is comparable to a lens like the 50mm Summicron (others here have compared compared it to the Cron) simply because the 50/2 macro is not very good at f/2--that's a major drawback for a lens that is being compared to the Summicron and a deal breaker for anyone who might need to use the lens wide open. In fact, I would describe the lens as unusable at f/2; it's just way too low contrast. At f/2.8 it's much improved. So in short, yes, the lens has characteristics that are highly recommendable, but I'm replacing it with a 50mm that I can confidently shoot with at f/2. If you don't need the f/2, you'll likely love this lens. Similar Products Used: Leica 50mm Summilux (pre-asph)
|
[Dec 17, 1999]
Mike Johnston
Expert
Model Reviewed:
OM-Zuiko 50mm f2.0 Macro
Strength:
Perfect all-purpose normal lens. Great sharpness, speed, close-focus, angle of view.
Weakness:
n/a This is one of the great little-known "sleepers" among 35mm camera lenses. I honestly think it's a better lens in virtually every way than the vaunted Leica 50mm Summicron. Unlike most macros, it's fast enough, and the right focal length, to use as a normal lens. Ironically, its only shortcoming might be its macro performance--I don't think it quite matches some of the competition at true macro distances, although it's good. But used as a normal lens, it's hard to match, let alone beat, at any price. P.S. I'm Editor-in-Chief of _PHOTO Techniques_ magazine (www.phototechmag.com). Customer Service n/a Similar Products Used: I've been a professional camera reviewer for a dozen years so I've used hundreds of 35mm lenses. |
[Oct 12, 2000]
Marcelo Guarini
Intermediate
Strength:
Super sharp, excellent contrast and color performance
Weakness:
Just a little bit bulky in the OM4-T body I agree with the reviewer Mr. Mike Johnston, this is the best normal lens I have ever used. It is clearly better than the last version of the 50 mm f2.0 Summicron-M, which I currently own. I have also compared its performance with some of my friends Cannons and Nikons normal lenses, and this Zuiko is the sharpest. Although I seldom use it for macro photography, its performance as such is also great. Customer Service Not required Similar Products Used: 50 mm f2.0 Summicron-M, 50 mm f3.5 macro Zuiko. |