Nikon AF300mm f/4 ED-IF Nikkor 35mm Primes

Nikon AF300mm f/4 ED-IF Nikkor 35mm Primes 

USER REVIEWS

Showing 11-20 of 28  
[May 10, 2000]
Mark Scheuern
Expert
Model Reviewed: AF300mm f/4 ED-IF Nikkor

Strength:

Very sharp, relatively inexpensive (compared to 2.8), great build quality.

Weakness:

AF speed somewhat slow for motorsports applications but still very usable, especially with faster-focusing bodies (e.g., F100, F5).

I love mine. It's a great alternative to the expensive, heavy 2.8 (which I may get someday). Beautifully built, very rugged, and fantastic optically. Works very well with the TC14b. An f/4 300 AFS is rumored to be in the works, which would focus faster and would provide AF and matrix metering with the TC14e.

Customer Service

None

Similar Products Used:

None

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[Apr 08, 2000]
Fahmi Nawawi
Expert
Model Reviewed: AF300mm f/4 ED-IF Nikkor

Strength:

Cheap (compared to other 300mm made by Nikon) but high sharpness.
Light, easy to handle, built-in tripod collar and hood. Accept 39mm filters.

Weakness:

Non D lense and slow AF.

I love this baby ! Couldn't ask for more, since I got this one at almost 1/3 of the high st. price in UK (a good quality used one). Its metallic finish indicates its ability to work under pro condition. Easy to hand hold, trust me. AF speed is just fine for me, no need for AFS since I seldom shoot action/sports.

Customer Service

Dont know them.

Similar Products Used:

None

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Apr 06, 2000]
Bob Scott
Intermediate
Model Reviewed: AF300mm f/4 ED-IF Nikkor

Strength:

Light, well-built, compact, inexpensive compared to the f/2.8 version. Good manual focus feel. Nice built-in tripod mount can swivel up out of the way for hand-held shooting. Works very well with the new Kenko Pro 300 1.4x and 2x converters.

Weakness:

AF a little slow, and sometimes hunts (using F4s), I'd like a real lens cap instead of the leather "sack and drawstring" supplied with the lens; it seems to let in a lot of dust.

I consider this lens the longest "amateur" lens in the Nikkor line. Any longer or faster, and you have to pay thousands. This is a very nice lens for under a thousand dollars street price. A serious amateur can usually get by with this lens and a converter for some wildlife shooting.

Customer Service

Four camera bodies, lots of lenses, lots of years, and I never needed any Nikon customer service!

Similar Products Used:

Nikkor 70-300 f/4-5.6D ED AF, third-party 400mm f/5.6

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
4
[Mar 16, 2000]
Steve Bingham
Professional
Model Reviewed: AF300mm f/4 ED-IF Nikkor

Strength:

Sharp! Well constructed and very tough lens. I know, I dropped mine and it still works just as good as it ever did!

Weakness:

Early models focused slow. Newer version (which I have) seems to focus very rapidly. I have used it for rodeos and birds in flight.

Great bang for the buck for amateur or professional.

Customer Service

Never had to use it!

Similar Products Used:

I used to have a Canon 300 with my old Canon system.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jan 25, 2000]
Dennis Aley
Professional
Model Reviewed: AF300mm f/4 ED-IF Nikkor

Strength:

Very sharp, works well with a 2X, in spite of being an f4.

Weakness:

No problems have been experienced with any of my Nikon lenses.

This lens has served me well in the field of wildlife photography. I often take just this lens and a 2x with me in the field. If like me you can not afford a 300 f2.8, this lens is an excellant subsatute.

Customer Service

Never have needed with Nikon products

Similar Products Used:

I have tried out some after market zoom lenses (* to 300MM)) none of which was as sharp as the 300MM f4.

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[Sep 16, 2000]
Vincent Quek
Intermediate

Strength:

Solid Built, Very Sharp, much Sharper than the 300mm f4.5 AIS.

Weakness:

Filter size of 92mm make it difficult for a good filter.I'm using a B&W MCR which cost USD100!

Best alternative if you can't afford the f2.8. In my opinion its optical performance is comparable with the 2.8 if not better except it can't go down to f2.8. One of the sharpest lens I have ever have, Can't reallt beat the F3AF 200mm f3.5 EDIF in terms of sharpness but which other lens can?
Absolutelt vaule for money for a 300mm Lens.

Customer Service

Never need them.

Similar Products Used:

Nikkor 300 f4.5 AIS
Nikkor 200 f3.5 EDIF for F3AF.
Nikkor 80-200 f2.8 AF-S
Nikkor 135mm f2.0 AIS

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Oct 23, 2000]
Mark Eastman
Expert

Strength:

Autofocus lens is extremely sharp even with a telecoverter. Solid construction, drop in filter drawer, built-in shade, wrinkle finish, rotable collar, very well balanced on a monopod.

Weakness:

Aperture setting ring is made of plastic and is exposed on back-end of the lens where it might be easily damaged.

An excellent lens and the best of all the 300 f4s Nikkors I've owned.

Customer Service

-

Similar Products Used:

Nikon 300 f4.5 EDIF AIS, 300 f4.5 AI, 300 f4.5

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
3
[Nov 14, 2000]
RD Kenwood
Intermediate

Strength:

Sharp, sharp, sharp.

Doesn't lose anything optically when used with the TC-14b 1.4x (420/5.6). In fact, it may be matched. It's also quite good with the Tamron 1.4x AF-d teleconverter, better, in fact, than the Tokina 400/5.6 AT-X I owned. It's better-than-adequate with the TC-301, which makes for a marginally useful 600/8.

It's great on a short tube.

Even illumination wide open (no light fall-off). Minimal field curvature - in practical use, none to speak of.

Weakness:

Big, heavy, with ponderous autofocus. A focus limiting ring speeds focus by limiting the range in which the lens will hunt. Autofocus is significantly better with my N90s than it was with my N8008s.

Not especially well-balanced or quick-handling when hand-held (but I have small hands).

Uses pricey 82mm filters in front or unique (and equally pricey) 39mm filters in a filter drawer. There is a drop-in circular polarizer available, but it's just as expensive as an 82mm one. For maximum flare resistance, use a multicoated front filter, if any.

Yes, it's big. Yes, it's heavy. Yes, it has slow AF. Yes, it's an old design. Yes, there are plenty of people who say that it's not as sharp as the 300/2.8. And, yes, it has just been replaced by the 300/4 AF-S. Still, its optical performance in the field overshadows all those weaknesses - so much so, that this is one of the few lenses I'm giving five stars in both categories. I can't bring myself to do otherwise; the Nikkor 300/4 ED AF just flat-out delivers the goods.

Customer Service

Not needed.

Similar Products Used:

Nikkor 300/4.5 EDIF

Tokina 400/5.6 AF AT-X

Nikkor 500/8N Reflex

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Dec 06, 2000]
todd krefeld
Expert

Strength:

Extremely sharp. Built like a tank. Focus limiter, and A/M switch.
Solid tripod mt.

Weakness:

Fairly slow AF

Great taste of "big glass". Filters get pricey. Try Cokin or Lee. Great with converters. Excellent choice if the 2.8 is out of reach.

Customer Service

Not needed

Similar Products Used:

Nikon 400 3.5

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jan 01, 2001]
Scott Alan Johnson
Intermediate

Strength:

clear clean and sharp with the right amount od contrast for all types of shooting.

Weakness:

wish i could focus a little closer than 9 feet..

one heck of a lens.. i got mine used but in mint condition.. i use it more than any other lens.

Similar Products Used:

sigma 300mm f4 .. not as clear.. a little color bleed in the reds

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
Showing 11-20 of 28  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

photographyreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com