Sunpak 622 Super Pro Flashes
Sunpak 622 Super Pro Flashes
USER REVIEWS
[Feb 16, 2001]
Steve Hutchens CPP
Professional
Strength:
Self contained bat, easy tou use controles, very powerful and good exposure.
Weakness:
Unable to find any local places for repair. I have 6 of these flashes and have been using them for over 8 years and love them. Customer Service Bad experinces with customer service Similar Products Used: Norman 400 |
[Nov 30, 1999]
Phil DeRosier
Intermediate
Model Reviewed:
622 Super Pro Zoom Flash Outfit
Strength:
Extremely powerful. Guide Numbers are probably 10 - 15 % higher than advertised.
Weakness:
None whatsoever. This is a product for the working pro. It's simple to set up, and has quick recycle times (when in auto). Similar Products Used: Minolta 3500xi/5400xi |
[Oct 01, 1999]
j j
Expert
Model Reviewed:
622 Super Pro Zoom Flash Outfit
Strength:
Hugely powerful, works via "dumb" interface with my P67 quite nicely, either in automagic mode or manual, and works like a charm with my N70 and the interface module, too. The price of the cord, however, is preposterious.
Weakness:
See D. Battery. C. D. Battery go dead. C. JJ Buy New Batteries. But I'm not surprised. It's huge, it's not cheap, but it will FLASH when you need a *F*L*A*S*H*. The range with my F2.4 standard lens and NHG-2 800 on the P67 is astonishing, and the range with the N70 and 50/1.4 and the same film boggles the mind, or at least the mind of someone who carried the old graphlight around many years ago using pushed XXX at football games. Customer Service Their response to e-mail questions is flat-out incoherent, evne when asked very precise, specific questions. Similar Products Used: other sunpacks, SB26 (Nikon, discontinued, good flash), ancient 510 volt Graphlight. |