Kodak Gold 200 Print Film

Kodak Gold 200 Print Film 

DESCRIPTION

Kodak Gold 200 is great film for bright or partly sunny conditions. It provides a refined combination of color saturation, color accuracy, and sharpness in a 200-speed film.

USER REVIEWS

Showing 11-20 of 48  
[Aug 07, 2000]
Misha
Intermediate

Strength:

Sharp, cheap and available everywhere. Very good general purpose film, Vivid color.

Weakness:

For the price I pay, I think its really value for money, so I can't compare the quality to other professional film.

Its the cheapest film in Malaysia, so yes I'll be using this for a long long time for general purpose shooting unless I find another cheaper product.

Customer Service

non

Similar Products Used:

Fuji

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jul 31, 2000]
Steve Lutz
Intermediate

Strength:

Good color saturation. A warm film that is well suited to people pictures.

Weakness:

None really

I like it. It does quite well for people pictures, particularly with a two flash set-up. Photos of women especially come out with flattering skin tones. Little grain for any normal application. It is also relatively cheap, so that helps.

Customer Service

Not used

Similar Products Used:

Fuji 100. Kodak 100 Agfa Optima II 100, Reala.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jul 31, 2000]
Chris Cavs
Intermediate

Strength:

ok color, nice for all around use

Weakness:

colors tend to wash out in lower light

Good over all film for different locations, especially when shooting a variety of subjects in a given location.

Similar Products Used:

None

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[Jul 23, 2000]
Jeffrey C
Intermediate

Strength:

cheap,
reliable,
acccurate,
good sharpness

Weakness:

almost nothing

I agree with the review below (Jason A.) that this is a very good performer- very good with skin tones. For the price, this the the best general purpose film- you can buy loads of it for about 1.50 a roll. It has accurate skin tones and saturated colors- all natural. May the greens are weaker than Fuji film, but colors are so much more natural that I use it if there are any people in the pics. When I go general snapping, this is the film- when other situations dictate, then I use something else, but this is the starting film for me. Very good sharpness, but more importantly, smooth color gradations (skin tones, too) for a 200 speed film.

Similar Products Used:

None

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jul 08, 2000]
Amy Marsh
Intermediate
Model Reviewed: Gold ISO 200

Strength:

Good general purpose film. Colors come out very warm. Does well for indoor people pics.

Weakness:

Lacks some sharpness.

Very consistant film. Seems to have a lot of gold/yellow to it that does well for indoor warm shooting. This was the film I started & stayed with for a least 6 months. There are better films out there that do a lot better in certain areas, but this a good, cheap, all purpose film.

Customer Service

n/a

Similar Products Used:

superia 200, royal gold 200

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[Jun 01, 2000]
Jason Antley
Expert
Model Reviewed: Gold ISO 200

Strength:

inexpensive
consistent
medium speed useful

Weakness:

not flashy, the old stable film

This is the most consistent film I have ever used and almost anywhere you buy it, it performs the same. Skin tones are the best in class, colors are saturated without oversaturation, and sharpness is high. It's cheap, too. There is a lot of hoopla over 400+ speed film, but only Royal Gold 400 classifies as excellent. The rest aren't any better than Gold 200 by a far margin. Superia 400 is has very high color saturation, but skin tones and color accuracy suffer. I have not tried slower Superias, but places that sell slower Fuji film usually stock with the older Fuji formulation(I call it the blue film). Gold 100 is not as flexible speedwise, but 200 skin tones are much warmer. Stick with reliable Gold 200, which is sharp, cheap, color accurate, and with good skin tones. For information only: Kodak Print Grain Index:RoyalGold400=39,Gold200=47,Gold100=45,RoyalGold200=41 (Kodak says a differential of 4 is noticable viewing a 4X6 print from 14", if farther then even less noticeable). Of course, use Kodak paper for best saturation and decent printing otherwise film almost doesn't matter. ***if anyone has experience with BIG enlargements with Color Print Films, please post experiences.

Similar Products Used:

None

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Mar 19, 2000]
M. Iaconno
Expert
Model Reviewed: Gold ISO 200

Strength:

Great all around film. Cheap and when purchased on sale in the 4 packs a good deal.

Weakness:

None

Great film, very sharp great colors under most all conditions.

Similar Products Used:

Fuji

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Sep 24, 2000]
Steve Potter
Intermediate

Strength:

In your face colour, low grain for a budget film, availability

Weakness:

Sometimes it overcooks the colour.

I use this quite a lot. It's especially useful for jazzing up dull scenes where it wrings out every last drop of colour. However, in bright and colourful places it can give false looking results. Fantastic value for money along with the Fuji 200.

Customer Service

No experience

Similar Products Used:

Fuji 200

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[Sep 21, 2000]
John Shaeffer
Intermediate

Strength:

Cheap, widely available, no grain, not too bad in low light situations.

Weakness:

This film really makes certain lenses sing and performs alright with everything.

This is a cheap, all purpose film, that for some reason has an affinity for certain lenses. When I run this through cameras with Rikenon lenses, I have never seen more brilliant color rendition, which does not seem to be as noticable on other lenses, although results are generally good. I've noticed the same thing on some of the Lomo pix posted in the Viewfinder section. I'd rate this right up there at the top with VX200 (very economical and vibrant color) and Afga 200 HDC (works good in old Prakticas, especially). All are excellent values for the bucks.

Similar Products Used:

Agfa 200 HDC
Konica VX200

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Oct 24, 2000]
Michael Poulos
Intermediate

Strength:

Warm, rich skin tones, not too red like Fuji Superia. Colors saturated but not unrealistic. Price compared to Royal Gold.

Weakness:

Speed, maybe. A little more expensive than fuji.

I have three sets of prints in front of me from a recent vacation. The Gold 200 prints have great skin tones and colors that are not saturated to the point that they bleed over each other. The fuji superia prints look terrible in comparison, I am speaking of the skin tones mostly. I was a fuji fan before this little experiment, now I know better. If you want people in your photos to look like they belong in a cartoon, buy Superia, if you want them to look like people buy Kodak Gold.

Customer Service

Not used.

Similar Products Used:

Fuji Superia 400, Agfa HDC 400.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
3
Showing 11-20 of 48  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

photographyreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com