Polaroid SprintScan 120 Film Scanner Film Scanners
Polaroid SprintScan 120 Film Scanner Film Scanners
USER REVIEWS
[Dec 19, 2002]
Jack Nadelle
Professional
Strength:
good build quality, great value compared to Nikon and Minolta.
Weakness:
My rebate never came!! Still is a good machine though and I would recommend it. It is not automatic quality assured. there is a lot to learn regarding scanning techniques! Great scanner, needs the glass film holder as film doesn't lie flat. I found silverfast to be incomprehensible- and I am not so stupid. I don't feel it is as good as a a drum scan but it is a really decent scan for the price. The operators skill is very important to obtaining good scans and there is a lot to learn regardless of which software/scanner interface you choose. How and why you make certain choices will effect the quality of your scans. Customer Service yet to see Similar Products Used: Minolta, nikon |
[Nov 20, 2002]
Steve
Expert
Strength:
Fast scans Sharp scans Low shadow noise Powerfull software
Weakness:
Film holder for 6x7 could be better. I modified mine to make the opening wider as it cut into the film excessively. I bought the glass holder when it came out and no longer have this problem. I have used the SS120 for about a year and I find that it performs exactly as advertised. I scan predominately 6x7 transparencies with quite a few 35mm slides as well. No banding, no quirks. Scan times are decent - 6x7, 4000dpi, 16 bit about 10-12 minutes - and I do not have a fast computer (475 Mhz, 256 Megs). Dark noise is very, very low (one pass scanning ALWAYS) and the Silverfast is excellent. Poloroid recently introduced a dust and scratches PS plugin that works pretty well that I use 10 - 20% of the time, otherwise clean film and manual dust spotting works fine by me. Am glad I bought the Polaroid over the Nikon 8000 (availability was an issue at the time). Would buy again today. Customer Service Not used. Similar Products Used: Epson flat bed. |
[Sep 26, 2001]
Brian MacDougall
Professional
Strength:
Astonishing image quality. Build seems nice. Styling is a little too trendy, however. Fast enough for me. Most important: you can actually get one shipped to your house without spending months on a waiting list!
Weakness:
The software. I have a pretty sophisticated color management system, so I just pass the 16-bit raw scans into Photoshop and assign a custom profile I built. From there it''s just a matter of tweaking for exposure compensation in PS. If I had to actually use the Polacolor Insight software for anything but raw capture, I would almost certainly have returned the unit. I would use VueScan (www.hamrick.com) before I would pay for SilverFast. Film needs to be FLAT. I weight mine under books before I scan it. Well, I got tired of waiting for the Nikon, and I had a project coming up. So far I''ve done about 60-70 scans with it. The scanner has more than met my expectations. Very sharp, good color quality, good shadow detail and great range add up to a very inexpensive unit that can give drum scanners and the Imacon a run for their money. I don''t know about the other reviewers, but I''m running mine on a G4 Mac with 1.5 gig RAM, Firewire and a RAID scratch disk, and a 700MB scan with preview only takes about 4 or 5 minutes, so I can''t complain about the speed. I also appreciate that I don''t have to cut up my strips of film: I have quite an archive of 120 film in strips of four 6cm x 6cm frames. The Nikon won''t accept a strip that long. A glass negative carrier is needed, and I''m told it''s in the works. I only scan color trannys and black and white, but I can''t see how anyone would be disappointed in the hardware part of this unit. The software is another matter. Customer Service Who knows? Haven''t needed it. But a Polaroid representative is a constant contributor to the Filmscanners Newsgroup. Similar Products Used: Minolta Multi-Scan, Nikon LS-2000, original Nikon Coolscan. |
[Apr 27, 2001]
C. Lee
Professional
Strength:
Scans are very nice and sharp. Very easy to set up especially with firewire. I starting right after loading software and restarting the Mac G4.
Weakness:
Slow when scanning medium format. 6x7 at 4000dpi takes over 10 minutes. Not much improvement on the PolaInsight software. I just bought the scanner yesterday. So far I like the scans. Very good quality for 35mm up to 6x7. I wish it would be as simple to use as my old SprintScan 35 plus with the old software. I bought the non-pro version so I didn't try the Silverfast software. I did save $500 though. Four stars because it can only be better. Customer Service N/A Similar Products Used: Nikon, Polaroid and Hidelberg. |
[Jun 05, 2001]
Pam Whitesell
Professional
Strength:
Beautiful scans, especially b&w.
Weakness:
No digital ice. After waiting years for an affordable 120 scanner, and months for the Nikon 8000 scanner, I took the previous reviewer's advice and bought the Polaroid. Customer Service The first phone call I made was prior to purchase. The woman that Similar Products Used: Nikon LS 1000 |
[Jul 06, 2001]
Don Allen
Professional
Strength:
I am using 768 MB RAM P3 600MHz machine with Firewire connection. Scans are clean and contrasty. Compare well with high end Scitex scans. Scanner is very easy to setup and use. I use the Silverfast Software for scanning.
Weakness:
Learning curve with Silverfast. I highly recommend the Silverfast software (which can also be purchased separately). Excellent scanner. Not drum/Scitex quality, but about 98 percent there and sometimes better. My scans have improved as I have learned Silverfast. Software makes a big difference in the scan quality - I felt it was more important than inflated hardware specs by competitors and I still feel that way. Customer Service Called a couple of times before purchase to compare S120 with Ultra. Very nice and helpful - returned calls. Similar Products Used: HP Photosmart |