Konica Minolta Dimage Scan Dual II Film Scanners
Konica Minolta Dimage Scan Dual II Film Scanners
USER REVIEWS
[Jan 30, 2016]
Igor
Intermediate
Strength:
easy to use, good quality
Weakness:
none Very good quality little film scanner. I use for both dia and negative scanning.
|
[Dec 10, 2015]
Ultrax
Professional
Strength:
Relatively robust. I've had it for well over a decade.
Weakness:
The bundled software produces horrible scans. Those who criticise this scanner should take a look at the software they are using. Forget what came in the box and try using Vuescan and you will see much better results. |
[Sep 26, 2009]
PTGold
Professional
Strength:
The price was right however I lost money trying to make this darn thing to work
Weakness:
Lame error codes Error = 5 Win2k or Error = 1 on XP
The darn thing works Great when it feels like working, however I am falling back to my Nikon scanners because this one has issues |
[Apr 05, 2003]
Jeri
Professional
Strength:
Good software allows a lot of control over gamma and white point settings. Easy to use
Weakness:
Clumsy transport system Dust-prone Scan quality was fine for web images. However I had major problems with the transport system. After doing an index scan, the scanner would frequently eject the film holder, feed it back in again and all subsequent scans would have a thin pixilated line down the centre. Turning the scanner off and on was the only way to correct the problem. Upgrading the driver helped at one point, but then I upgraded the operating system and the problem started up again. The unit was sent in to Minolta, with samples, while still under warranty but they claimed they were unable to replicate the problem. It's annoying and I would not recommend the scanner for this reason. Customer Service Henry's did their best but the problem was with the manufacturer. No difficulties with them but they claimed they were unable to replicate the problem, which continues to this day. Similar Products Used: Flatbeds - Umax Astra with transparency head HP Scanjet 6100 series |
[Jan 16, 2002]
bobticoune
Expert
Strength:
- Price - Good for Web utility
Weakness:
- Cheap body (100% plastic) - USB connexion - Horizontal slot (bad for dust) - Very slow prescan - Very slow scanning - Bad color management (to much Blue/Magenta) Despite the good intentions of Minolta, this scanner don''''t give us the minimum quality we looking for (If you want great large quality prints). To those who need a film scanner only to ship pictures by E-Mails or to incorporate picture into Microsoft Word pages it''''s O.K. The best advices I can give you is: stay away from that scanner and stay away from any model who had USB connexion. Customer Service No request needed Similar Products Used: CanoScan FS 2710 Dîmage Scan Elite Dîmage Scan Multi II LS-4500AF |
[Oct 04, 2001]
lluis romero
Professional
Strength:
Price, volume,usb bus,good resolution
Weakness:
Software , increases grain,scratches and dust ,noisy and very slow. I think that is a good choice for anybody who don''t need fast scans.The quality is good but you''ll get bests results and more image control if you select "positive film", even you''re using negative.Then , invert colors in photoshop and adjust levels.The minolta software is very limited correcting gamma. Similar Products Used: kodak rfs3600,nikon coolscan LS30 and some flat bed scanners |
[Sep 06, 2000]
Peter Morris
Expert
Strength:
USB Plug and Play - yes it works! Good, versatile scanning software + photoshop LE. Good, sharp, low noise scans (grain visible on 400ISO negs at max resolution - soften in Photoshop or Paintshop Pro to remove). Dmax appears to exceeds spec. Good colour saturation. 12Bits per channel - exports at 8Bits or 16Bits.
Weakness:
Digital ICE would be nice but price would increase. Dust can be a problem - make sure negs and slides are clean. A little slow (mainly due to my computer - I need more RAM and faster processor) An excellent scanner. Automatic settings can be used but software provides for manual settings which I prefer. Good tonal range and colour fidelity. Auto or manual focus control. High quality scans at a reasonable price. Customer Service Not required but downloaded manual before purchase with no problem. Similar Products Used: Various |
[Sep 26, 2000]
Ivo Verhaar
Intermediate
Strength:
USB
Weakness:
No Digital ICE Excellent value for money! User Friendly. Negative to Positive in Auto mode works very good, no correction needed in most cases. APS function rudimental. Lacks access to IX Data which is easy for archiving. No Digital ICE! Customer Service US Site does not allow european customers to enter mail due to NL extention. Similar Products Used: None |
[Sep 28, 2000]
Steve Steele
Expert
Strength:
- High resolution. Only matched or bettered by Polaroid.
Weakness:
-None for its price range. This is a great little scanner for the money. It delivers very sharp results. When coupled with Ed Hamrick's VueScan software, there is no rival below $1300. After several test scans and a review of several test scans from other vendors, I can say that is a great value. If you want higher quality and resolution, the Polaroid is a better scanner, but at a high price tag. Similar Products Used: -HP Photsmart |
[Oct 23, 2000]
Fausto Araujo
Intermediate
Strength:
Price, user friendly, USB interface, APS capability, simple and effective software, from a good reputation maker, iMac compatible
Weakness:
A bit noisy, a bit slow (maybe because of limitations in my computer) I have limited experience with film scanners but I like this one. It is simple, easy to work with, produce great results and, important in my case, it is affordable. Customer Service Not needed yet Similar Products Used: Flat scanner with transparancy adapter |