Durst M 600/605 Classic Enlarger Enlargers
Durst M 600/605 Classic Enlarger Enlargers
USER REVIEWS
[Sep 07, 2001]
lawrence_i
Expert
Strength:
Compact, mostly metal parts.
Weakness:
No way to align it if it''s out of alignment. No head for VC paper (you must use filters). I had a Durst 605 with B&W condenser head, however I sold it because it was misaligned and there was no way to correct this (I am a bit of a fanatic for having the enlarger properly aligned as I like corner to corner sharpness). Similar Products Used: Omega D2, Beseler C23, Kaiser VPM9005 |
[Sep 25, 2000]
Michael Goldfarb
Expert
Strength:
(This review is for an old M600 with a plain old incandescent enlarging bulb.)
Weakness:
The multi-format glass negative carrier is wacky. Early on, we replaced it with a very simple hinged glassless carrier from the Astrolux, which always worked just fine. (The above-the-neg-stage filter drawer was also inconvenient; we rigged a hanger under the lens for VC filters.) Nice little machine, perfect for 35mm b/w use in a first darkroom. Well-built enough that many of today's 30-year-old models are still perfectly serviceable. And for its small size/weight, its ability to also handle 6x6 MF negs is pretty impressive. Customer Service Never had a problem we couldn't handle ourselves. Similar Products Used: Beseler 23C, Federal, "Astrolux" (clone to Bogen B-35), and assorted larger-format enlargers. |