Canon Sure Shot Classic 120 Point and Shoot
Canon Sure Shot Classic 120 Point and Shoot
[Feb 01, 2001]
Edward Lin
Casual
Strength:
excellent optics throughout a very useful zoom range
Weakness:
flash pops out from the side and cannot be retracted even when it's not in use The strenghs of this camera have been pointed out in the previous reviews. I'm here just to add another 5-star rating to this well deserved point&shoot camera that spits out pictures with near-slr quality. Customer Service none needed yet Similar Products Used: various brands of point&shoot |
[Jan 31, 2001]
KrrZ TAN
Casual
Strength:
Versatile zoom. Good contrast, nice color rendering, low flare.
Weakness:
Obvious distortion when it's in wide range and disappear when use in Tele mode. Good camera and high quality in this price range. Customer Service None Similar Products Used: Leica Mini 3 |
[Feb 03, 2001]
Joe M.
Intermediate
Strength:
Compact, well built and good size for me. Controls easy to use. Looks like a quality piece.
Weakness:
Would like to have maybe a 28mm-120mm with faster lens. This is my 2nd "follow-up" review; see 1st review on Jan 15th. My camera took lousy pics! Out of focus, soft and not clear & crisp at any distance. Since most reviews were 4 or 5 stars, I questioned why my camera gave unacceptable pictures. I sent it back to Canon after having it since April, 2000 for inspection and evaluation. This review is based on my treatment from Canon. Customer Service Really good. See review. These folks treated me well. Just now waiting on pics to come back after factory "restored camera to specs and adjusted focus (AE). Similar Products Used: Fuji and older SLRs |
[Feb 21, 2001]
Gordon Daniels
Intermediate
Strength:
Amazing sharpness at short focal lengths, and still quite acceptable at 120mm. Very good contrast and color rendition. Very accurate autofocus, even at closest focusing distance. All those gee-whiz features - they actually work.
Weakness:
Moderate distortion (straight lines bow inward) at shortest focal lengths. I really wish they had optimized the lens at the focal lengths I use most - I take far more pictures at 38 mm than at 120mm. I've had this little beauty for about 8 months now, and I haven't had a disappointing roll. Except for the distortion problem, which is annoying but no worse than on other cameras with this focal range, I am amazed at the consistent quality of the pictures, indoors and out. I've tried the sport setting, the auto-portrait setting, the close-focus with flash setting - not stuff I use much, but they really work! I like this camera better than any other P&S I have used. Customer Service Haven't needed Similar Products Used: Mostly use SLR (Nikon), but have used P&S cameras from Minolta, Pentax, Olympus |
[Feb 27, 2001]
Greg Kandra
Casual
Strength:
Superb lens, varied and unique features, quality of construction.
Weakness:
Wide lens isn't THAT wide, quirky flash always sticks out, dumb battery cover design. Put simply, this camera is the standard against which all other point and shoot zooms should be judged. Customer Service N/A Similar Products Used: Olympus LT 105, Olympus 80 Wide DLX, Stylus Epic, Fuji Endeavor (APS) |
[Feb 22, 2001]
Dmitry Mokeev
Intermediate
Strength:
Almost metal case, beautiful appearance (reminds old rangefinder cameras). Shooting turns to aesthetic pleasure. For such appearance of the camera it is possible to forgive all its lacks. The camera looks more expensive, than it costs. Well lays in a hand, impresses the reliable and well-constructed device. Correct and very fast focussing is faster, than at any another P&S camera in the market. The soft objective and excellent filling flash are very good for shooting portraits. It has effective suppression of red eyes, convenient management by Jog Dial. Spot gauging of an exposition, +-1.5 correction of an exposition. User adjustments remembered at switching-off. It has the biggest set of functions for devices of this class.
Weakness:
Lacks. Flash creeps out even at its compulsory switching-off and creates inconvenience to the left hand. Inconvenient management of additional functions by very small rubber buttons (though their arrangement under a small cover is pleasant to me). Pressing these buttons almost is not felt. On wide position of an objective distortion is very appreciable (vertical lines looks as | / /). It's very difficult to shoot at close-up distance (parallax frameworks does no help much, and in general it is not clear, what distance they there are designed for). I'd like to have 28 - 90 mm lenses in the same case as Prima 120 (I don't like design of Canon Prima 28-90). Choosing of program modes (portrait, sport, and macro) does not influence on aperture at all as it would be possible to expect. In the user's guide there is not enough information on the advanced modes. In Internet I have not found much too. If someone knows the sites devoted to this camera (it deserves it), prompt where they are. As a whole, I agree with reviews on this site. I belive there are many compact cameras that are able to make some better pictures (such as Contax and Leica), but travelling photographer can quite love this camera. Generally I use SLR, but I take my Canon Prima 120 with pleasure. My SLR Pentax photos can be better but using Canon Prima for some reason is much more pleasant. I am very pleased with this purchase. It's must buy. Customer Service Not used. I'd like to have more information about camera on Net. Just for fun. Similar Products Used: Pentax MZ-50, Zenit SLR, Minolta and Practika P&Ss. |
[Mar 05, 2001]
charles stewart
Professional
Strength:
Very well engineered, thought out and executed. Lens good for an extended-range zoom in a compact camera, though, so far, I can't see that it stands comparison with quality primes, though I didn't expect that much. Most of the features and functions are useful, and they actually work. The camera is actually fun to use, which is more than you can say about the vast majority of cameras.
Weakness:
The pop-out flash almost kept me from buying the camera. Presently I'm taping it closed, although I am *not* recommending this, since I do not really know what the consequences will be. So far it just seems to keep the flash in the off mode. It's very cool, and I hope there will be some sort of fan page on the web at some point, so people can compare notes about mastering its quirks. This camera is much more user-friendly than the T4 super, however I've mastered the use of the T4 to the point where, if I'm careful, I can get quite professional-looking 8X10" prints. I've not yet found this to be the case with the 120 Classic, but my results are suffering from sharpness-destroying overexposure at this point, and I may change my mind when I've overcome that. I hope this camera is the first of a line. Canon could shorten the zoom range (38-90?), make the lens a bit faster, add aperture priority, flash on demand only, more focus zones, and a black body, while deleting captions, dates, etc., to make an enthusiast's alternative to this something-for-everyone version. I'd be first in line for it. Hurrah for the hybrid focussing system. Wish I could give more stars for value: look what you have to shell out for a minilux zoom, for example. Customer Service Haven't used it yet. Similar Products Used: yashica t4, olympus XA, olympus sylus epic. |
[Mar 08, 2001]
Darrell/ D.
Intermediate
Strength:
This camera takes great pictures. One of the major strengths is the Personal mode. The size and look of the camera is first rate.
Weakness:
Its been said before but that flash popping out the side is bound to break. Also the battery door is flimsy and prone to breakage if your not carefull. The quality of the pictures from the 120 are very very good. I bought this camera for my wife for Christmas based on the reviews found here and on other sites and we have not been disappointed. Customer Service Have not had the mis-fortune to use it as of yet. Similar Products Used: Olympus Infinty 3000 zoom, Pentax Zoom 90WR |
[Mar 20, 2001]
Karma
Casual
Strength:
great sharp pictures. all features work well and very small and convenient to use.
Weakness:
flash could have been located more intelligent to appear when selected or required! really solid construction and quality of an SLR. The easily accessible features are cool and give you a level of command for composition that you would not normally expect from a P&S camera. Definitely one of the all time greats. Good retro look too. Strongly recommend for anyone who wants great photos without having to become a progessional.. Customer Service have not had to use yet and seeing the robust build of the camera, hope won't have to find out. Similar Products Used: nikon and pentac P&S |
[Apr 03, 2001]
Boon
Casual
Strength:
Large zoom range for a P&S
Weakness:
Poor placement of the flash I found the camera to be easy to use offering good picture quality for the price, when it worked. It didn't like the Fuji Superia 400 film i was using. I kept on getting a 'H' error when i took a picture with the film. It turns out the camera couldn't wind the film correctly and therefore my pictures were being exposed on top of each other. The instruction manual didn't help, all it said was to take the batteries out and put them back in again to resolve the problem! Which of course it didn't. Customer Service Hopeless went for repair twice and was still unable to fix the 'H' error. Genius (where i bought it) were useless as well, cardboard cut out people would do a better job! Similar Products Used: None |