I like the quality of this camera, it works well.- mechanic mobile service

none . . .

A colleague from Amarillo Drywall Contractors have a collection of cameras and this LX caught my attention. I eventually bought it from him. No regrets! :)

None none none

Solid body with manual controls Excellent lenses Ergonomics. | Flooring Company

Slow AF (depending on lens)

I like the quality of this camera, it works well. medicine crusher

None so far.

You have a very nice product! altera

none so far

This is a great camera build like a brick, very rugged and reliable! Really, sticky mirror a problem? It's a remove and replace task that takes any camera repair tech 5 minutes as part of the routine CLA you should have done before using any used camera.

None that I can see.

There is no sem-pro in this camera, it is a professional quality camera that with reasonable care can last a lifetime and take great pictures.

Similar Products Used:

Nikon FM3.

The best 35 mm film SLR ever made

One can always find a weakness, but in 1980 it was well ahead of its time.

The best 35 mm film SLR ever made

Nearly indestructible, weather-proof body
incredibly well-designed and compact layout of controls
uncluttered but complete exposure information available in viewfinder
IDM metering system (exposure range from EV 20 down to - 6.5!!)
interchangeable focusing screens
very useful hand grip
120 degree buttery smooth throw
double exposure button doubling as rewind release
mirror lock-up
Bulb setting
No batteries necessary!!!!

Bad winder interface (poor wire design?)
Funky neck strap lugs on the same side?!? The halibut-design.

After trying nearly every major manufacturer's cameras in the last 25 years (Leica, Mamiya, Nikon, Canon, Minolta, Yashica), when all is said and done, the Pentax LX comes closest to being the ideal SLR. The body is nearly indestructible, the incredibly well-designed and compact layout of controls, the uncluttered but complete exposure information available in the viewfinder, the ability to handle the most difficult lighting situations due to its IDM metering system (hey, how many cameras do you know that have an exposure range from EV 20 down to - 6.5?!?), its interchangeable focusing screens, very useful handgrip, 120 degree buttery smooth throw, double exposure button doubling as rewind release... need I go on and on?? It was simply the best SLR ever made, at least from a user-perspective (Canon, Nikon, and Leica owners will have you think otherwise, due to nothing more than millions of dollars spent on clever and ubiquitous marketing from these companies).

Then add all the glorious Takumars you can use with an M42/K adapter, not to mention the limited lens series which have been rated as the most accurate lenses ever tested, and what superlatives are you left with?

It's simply the best, and I will never make the mistake of selling mine again. Thankfully, I was able to buy another one, and this one I'm keeping. Forever.

Customer Service

n/a

Similar Products Used:

Pentax MX
Canon F1
Minolta 7
Leicaflex
Nikon F2

Mine has a sticky mirror problem, though this is supposed to be a weakness, read on: even when the mirror failed to flip up correctly (due to the old gluey joints) at the trip of the shutter button the metering proved it's legendary status by exposing the film correctly! Example: the meter reads the scene to be 1/30s, shutter depressed, the mirror doesnt flip up till some miliseconds later, but the mirror stays up a bit longer than the 1/30 to compensate. Was really surprised when I got my first test roll of slides back. Was expecting half exposed frames and even underexposure, but the slides were PERFECT. I first thought the 'erronous' exposure time (1/30 became 1/15 or 1/8) was just that: erronous, but in fact not because the meter keeps adjusting itself even when the shutter is open for film exposure. The mirror lock up is a brilliant feature. You'd need it for long exposures up to minutes (my longest exposure was some 15 minutes though I thought this was impossible). Are the accessories a strength or a weakness? The FA1-W finder is fantastic simply because you can adjust it to your eye's need. Clear and bright viewfinder. The accessories system however makes this camera a very flexible and customizable tool. Pentax lenses are underated, especially the primes. Trust me, for the price paid they give you the best bang for the buck. Those who are used to the sizes and weight of pro level Canon and Nikon cameras may find the LX to be tiny and light though compared to the

The sticky mirror. Though the OTF metering corrects the exposure it is very irritating. The lack of a exposure lock is something the designers missed. The slow sync speed makes fill in flash almost impossible (but I hardly use the flash anyway). I won't use this camera any further till I've had it serviced and repaired, but so far quotes from independent and Pentax seem to be much too high. Again the question about the accessories, strength or weakness? The motordrive and winder to body design is flimsy and badly thought out. Film may get damaged by light leak when attaching the winder to the body. Those who are used to the sizes and weight of pro level Canon and Nikon cameras may find the LX to be tiny and light, but may be too tiny and light for the said Canon and Nikon users. In the strength category I praised the lenses for being affordable: warning here, the best lenses (like the 85mm lenses) are not. They're sometimes equal if not more expensive than Nikkors. Note: Pentax made many unannounced revisions to this camera during it's 20 years in production. Mine is a rather early model with serial number 524***.

Even if the metering system is only centre weighted, it is uncannily accurate. Not the camera you will want if you are a feature and gadget geek, for this is a no nonsense tool. This camera should bring a great sense of fulfilment and joy to all DoItYourself photographers (the same fellows who might rate vegetarian cameras like the Nikon FM2 and Canon F1n highly). Ignore the value and overall rating down there, it's a subjective thing. Without a worthy successor from Pentax, this camera has become THE Pentax, the cult symbol, and with that, the price keeps rising annually. Too bad Pentax put this camera (as an electronic version) into a flimsy plastic shell of the MZ-3. It took me 5 years to hunt down a second hand body which price (£250) matches it's condition- cosmetically. But alas, the sticky mirror problem!

Customer Service

Haven't used it. I go to independent workshops manned by former in-house-Pentax technicians.

Similar Products Used:

Pentax MZ50, ME super, MX. Nikon FM2, FE2. Mamiya C220.

From new utterly reliable and still useable when batteries fail. Light and beautiful to hold.

No spot reading, and slightly dim screens by today''s standard.

I bought two LX''s for work (pathology) back in the early 80''s. I still have them and they still work well, with only one of them having required a full overhaul during this period. My colleagues use Nikons (as I do domestically) but I have never once had any reason to doubt that first decision. This is one of the very best 35mmSLR''s EVER. But,as somebody has already said, do check condition: these are so good they get hammered, especially by people like me taking several thousand frames each year. Pentax prime lenses are very good and their macro''s up there with the very best. Never usued their zooms.

Customer Service

In the UK very good, though rarely used.

Similar Products Used:

Nikon F2,F3 and FM. Leicaflex and M1,2 @3.