Canon EF 35mm SLRs
Canon EF 35mm SLRs
USER REVIEWS
[Dec 27, 2014]
David Murray
Intermediate
Strength:
Very solid build. Very reliable, inspires confidence.
Weakness:
Heavy metal might not suit some people. I only take one body out with me per trip (I have F1, EF, FTB) The remarks apply to EF/F1/FTB and all FD lenses with chrome Breechlock mounting ring and 55mm filter threads.
Similar Products Used: Nikkormat FT, Pentax S1a |
[Dec 17, 2004]
peer
Casual
Strength:
sturdy, materials that will stay ages, smooth handling, FD stuff is nowadays not expensive, no batteries required, like when you have a dog, people start to talk spontaniousy, only the camera doesn't need to be fed.
Weakness:
viewfinderinformation could be more complete When I looked at the shopwindow, I didn't exactly know the EF. I knew the A-series, the F, but not the EF. I took the camera in my hand and fell in love on the first sight. Beautiful materials and smooth handling. I am sure many other cameras will produce the same quality photographs, but will not give me the same happy feeling when I take them into my hands. Last year I started to encouter the macro-world and together with the macro 3.5 50 mm and a FD bellows it works lovely. There is one thing that ennoys me sometimes: In the viewfinder I cannot see if the diafragm is set on A or not. So sometimes it has happened that I took photographs thinking automatic exposure, while the camera is set on manual. Customer Service never needed to go to a repairman or shop because the camera did not work. Similar Products Used: Nikon fm2 |
[Dec 11, 2003]
SHB50
Intermediate
Strength:
Build quality, camera feel, ergonomics, the miror lock up system, the multiple exposure control, the large shutter speed dial, and the metering system.
Weakness:
Its used value, lack of motor drive (but I can crank the film winder pretty fast) and lack of quick load (QL) capability... the FTb has it and it is a very easy loader. I have owned this camera from new, purchased in 1976. It is the special edition Montreal Olympics version. I have always had incredible results from this old war horse. The light meter is biased to reduce the impact of the sky. I love the electro-mechanical shutter, the mirror lock-up feature and the incredible build quality. I have a large compliment of breech lock lenses (brass on brass and real quality) and use them all with this EF. According to what I was told way back when, the shutter was good for at least 100,000 exposures. I agree with others that the used value is low for this camera (I cannot see why) as my 2 FTb's are worth way more than the EF. Yet, it is a quality camera, built on the F1 platform, and a capable user. Customer Service Never required service of any kind. Similar Products Used: FTb, Canonet QL 17, various other Canonets, Agfa ePhoto 1280 |
[Apr 03, 2003]
cliffs
Intermediate
Strength:
Solid,reliable, dependable,easy to use excellent light sensitivity.Controls well designed and use without taking your eye from the viewfinder
Weakness:
Heavy,as expected from a brass bodied camera,Have small problem with slow speeds geartrain in cold weather Bought as back-up about 22 years ago for backupto but the EF is still going while the A1 has problems. Solid reliable and almost in mint condition. Just bought an F1N but the EF will remain.This camera will probably still be functioning when the EOS's are dead and buried. Customer Service None available from Canon, independent repairers. Similar Products Used: Canon EXee, Canon A1, Canon F1N. |
[Jul 07, 2002]
ozalba
Expert
Strength:
Good meter and exposure display (no horrible LEDs); exposure lock button for tweaking the auto reading; double exposure facility; mirror lock-up; not battery dependent for 1/1000 - 1/2 sec; you can turn the meter system off when using long (B) exposures or flash; 1/125 flash sync.
Weakness:
Heavy; no interchangeable screens/head; no motordrive (apart from a variation I've never seen on the market). No AF. Bought my first EF new, in 78 - one of the last. Loved it ever since: it was ergonomically designed, before the word was popular. Shutter speed and shutter release easy to use without taking eye away from viewfinder (and far easier than its successor, the AE1). Easy to read shutter speed and aperture in viewfinder. I almost always used it on auto, but used it like a manual camera, watching the settings carefully. It's a very solid camera, which I'm quite happy with; I like brass bodies. It feels silky smooth to operate, and feels like quality, if outdated now. However, for anyone who wants a traditional, reliable auto/manual camera with some rather special qualities, this is a great choice. Customer Service Had them serviced once, just to give them the once-over. Local man, not expensive. Similar Products Used: F4, F801, OM2 |
[Jan 19, 2002]
Philip Canard
Expert
Strength:
Mirror and diaphragm lockup, great meter, robust and precise build, all metal construction, fabulous FD lenses, 1/125 flash sync, easy double exposures, fast exposure compensation, low battery drain, operates flawlessly in extreme cold conditions, and beautiful enough simply to buy as an art piece or photographer''s paperweight.
Weakness:
No motor drive capability, no interchangeable focusing screens, no aperture priority mode, no parts availability, fairly large and heavy. I bought an EF in 1976 and learned most of my basic photography on it. It gave perfectly exposed slides from day one in shutter priority semi-auto mode. Full auto is not a very useful feature in a camera, since you need to control shutter speed or aperture, based on what you are doing. I have learned that shutter priority is the best in an action situation, whereas in a non-action situation manual control is best, so that depth of field can be checked. Aperture priority is good for grab shots where you set your focus to the hyperfocal distance and simply frame and press the shutter button. That usually happens at parties where you are indoors and can use an auto flash (I bought a Vivitar 283 for that purpose, great flash!) for the exposure control, so I did not suffer much from the lack of aperture preferred automation. This camera just oozes quality, and the meter is one of the best center-weighted meters I know of. It ignores bright skylight in horizontal scenic shots in the top third of the frame. You lose that feature if framed vertically, but can be useful feature if strong light is to one side. The exposure lock button is quicker and more foolproof to use than a compensation dial that must me twiddled and then returned to normal position. You can throw away the batteries and still have a very good manual camera, something that my OM-2 cannot do. I used my camera in Alaska and Minnesota in auto mode in the dead of winter after fulling cold soaking and never experienced battery failure. Not many battery operated AE cameras can do that. Batteries were only necessary to power the meter and hold the shutter open during extremely long exposures. Yes, this camera can take moonlight photos, just like the later introduced OM-2. A truly great camera for those doing low light photography or photography in extreme cold. You should not use a motor drive in extreme cold when film is brittle and static discharge from low humidity is a problem, so lack of motor operation is not a concern for nature photographers in that situation. I sold mine, along with my F1 and FD lenses, and later got into the Olympus OM System due to the greater convenience of much less weight, great ergonomics, and current availability of wonderful Zuiko lenses at bargain prices (poor man''s Leicaflex). Customer Service Buy broken bodies for spare parts. Canon quit support long ago. Must find good independent repairman, or do it yourself. Similar Products Used: Nikon F & F2, Canon F1n, Minolta XE-7, Olympus OM-1 & OM-2. |
[Oct 14, 2001]
dead2fred
Intermediate
Strength:
Accurate meter, AE lock, Shutter Priority, Double Exposure capability, Mirror Lock-up, Tough as nails and 30 second shutter timer great for those moon shots. Not to mention that it LOOKS GREAT!!!
Weakness:
Doesn''t have all the goodies like a speedfinder, interchangable focus screens or motor drive like the F-1. But that''s why I have one of them. I bought my EF 2 years ago on E-Bay and haven''t regreted it once. Lighter than my F-1n and a more accurate meter to boot, I find easier to handle in casual photo opportunities than the big gun. Customer Service Haven''t needed any. Similar Products Used: Canon F-1n AE-1 FT EOS 3 |
[Aug 20, 2000]
Jim Griggs
Professional
Strength:
Solid performer with exceptional meter. Simple operation made this my main back-up camera to the F-1's. Ease of use made this a camera I could give to one of my kids to shoot with and expect excellent results. I recently parted with my original EF and now wish I had it back. My friend who bought it is a photo novice and turns out excellent photos with the camera.
Weakness:
No motor drive available was the only drawback. If I could only carry one camera on asignment it would be my EF. The meter has always been dead on even in rough lighting situations. Customer Service Never had any problems with this camera. Similar Products Used: F-1's, A-1,AE-1P, AT-1, and full line of lenses. |
[Jul 30, 2000]
Dave Gallier
Professional
Strength:
Everything about this camera shines.
Weakness:
None As a photographer and camera repairman, let me state that this is how cameras should be built. I have had a few in my shop and can honestly state that they are no more difficult to repair than any other manual camera (parts can be difficult to locate, however). In my over 20 years of camera repair, I have had only 5 of these cameras in my shop for repairs. Again, repairs were always fast and easy. Customer Service Not required Similar Products Used: Canon F-1n, A-1 |
[Jul 26, 2000]
Berth Westman
Expert
Strength:
Flexibility: Both mechanical and electrical shutter speeds. Mirror lock up. Depth of field button. Very good viewfinder with all info you need.
Weakness:
Mine broke once and it was rather expensive to repair... I like this camera a lot. Very good performance and value for money, if it not breaks down... Customer Service Fast but expensive (not canon, a local repairman) Similar Products Used: Nikon FE, FA, F501, Minolta X 700, Pentax MX, and a lot more. |