Canon PowerShot G7 8 to 10 Megapixel

Canon PowerShot G7 8 to 10 Megapixel 

DESCRIPTION

A matte black, retro design houses impressive capabilities and top specs, including 10.0 megapixel resolution and a powerful 6x, image-stabilized optical zoom lens.

USER REVIEWS

Showing 1-9 of 9  
[Sep 06, 2007]
bobtodrick
Expert

Strength:

Good lens.
Easy to use manual control
Good resolution.
Perfectly acceptable noise at 400, not bad at 800.
(face it, if there was no noise at 800 on a camera, why would they even bother with 100)
Build quality
Not so dinky that it is hard to hold

Weakness:

No raw
Not the most intuitive menu

I think a lot of people miss the point of this camera.
It is not a DSLR.
It is not really a P&S.
It is more along the lines of a Leica M8 without the steep price or the interchangeable lenses.
What it is great for is street shooting...documentary grab shots of people that you just would not get pointing a big DSLR with F2.8 megazoom in there face.
It is quiet...it is unobtusive...yet it has full manual control and a good lens.
And just like my M6 loaded with Tri-X it is a bit grainy, especially when pushed to 800.
It's a tool designed for a specific kind of shooting in my mind. Sure, if I want perfectly noiseless/grainless images I'll get out the DSLR/SLR, put the rig on a tripod and shoot away.
But if I want that next to impossible shot, handheld in low light, trying to be unobtrusive, I'll put up with a bit of grain/noise.

There is no 'do everything' camera.

Customer Service

It's Canon...as good as it gets

Similar Products Used:

Nikon P5000 (terrible lag time...otherwise good camera)
Leica M6...still the best for B&W

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[Aug 27, 2007]
m smith
Professional

Strength:

Solid

Weakness:

Noise

I like the retro look and solidity of this camera, but and there is a big but with this camera, it's the 10 megapixels of G7, due to the small sensor its almost impossible to take a shot without noise unless the lighting is absolutely perfect.

I have a Nokon D70 also and compared I spend hours more in Photoshop trying to compensate for the noise.

The noise in the pictures is a really big problem for this camera.

I recently talked to a very big importer of digital cameras, and he admitted that the 10 megapixels cameras simply do not make better pictures than 6 megapixel cameras.

And you should be aware that the reason Canon do not fit it with RAW is, that the noice problem would further enhanced in RAW mode

Similar Products Used:

Fuji FD31, which do much better suppressing noise

OVERALL
RATING
3
VALUE
RATING
3
[Jun 13, 2007]
azonicbruce
Intermediate

Strength:

*More/better manual controls - it is MUCH easier to get to and change camera settings and parameters than the F30. F30 is much more menu dependent; G7 has more accessible, useful buttons and dials.

* More "creative" features - Things like external flash (comment below regarding this), ND filter, manual focus, etc. give more creative control and more image possibilities with this camera than the F30. Also, I'm a big panorama fan, and the photo-stitching capabilities are a real treat. You can still do it without the feature or PhotoStitch software, but it can be more difficult. PhotoStitch tends to do a very good job combined with the G7's stitch feature.

* Lens/Shutter Capability - G7 has IS, which helps when trying to shoot in the 1/10 to 1/30 shutter speed range. The lens also has a longer reach, 6X vs the 3X of the F30. Also, the F30 tends to lock focus even though the object you're shooting may be too close. Unless you realize you are too close and switch it to macro mode, the focus will lock but the image will be blurry. The G7 seems to not struggle as much in these situations; it seems to do better at short distances in focusing before needing to switch over to macro mode.

Weakness:

* Portabilty - Not as compact as the F30. Also, the F30 feels much easier to grip. It's lighter, and has a grip area for your thumb on the back of the camera. The G7 is heavier. You need to have a tighter grip on the camera.

* Noise - This is a tossup, in my opinion. Fuji's noise, as defined by the industry, is much lower than the G7, especially at ISO 400 and above. However, the F30 still suffers from what I call "artifacts" or "dots" that make the image not nearly as "clean" as those seen from a dSLR. Still, F30 is still considered "best in class" G7 is good but again, is more noticeable than the F30 or a dSLR

* Speed - Much to my dismay, the focus speed and shutter lag were noticebly faster on the F30. This is especially true when using the LCD or flash; it is much slower on the G7. Using an external flash on the G7 is downright laughable. Someone else said it best regarding this: "That's not a lag - it's a siesta" Compared to my D30, is isn't even in the same class.

Since this camera falls into the "compact digitial" category, most of my opinions are based off of a camera I'm already pleased with, the Fuji F30 (see domments below).

For my full report, go to:
http://www.60hzproductions.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=33&Itemid=1

In general, though, I do think the G7 is one of the better compact digital cameras out there. It is NOT a replacement for a dSLR, speed-wise nor image-quality-wise. BUT, if you realize its limitations, you will be happy with its performance and the portability it affords.

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[Jun 13, 2007]
radair
Intermediate

Strength:

nice LCD screen
Image stabilization
solid build & quality
easy to use controls

Weakness:

a little shutter lag, but not bad
faster lens would be nice

I really like this camera. It is significantly bigger than a point & shoot, but small enough to go into a small fanny pack. I bought this camera because none of the P&S cameras I have owned have worked very well for action photos in dim light. While I still have a lot to learn, it has many auto and manual features that really help getting decent shots. Pretty easy to change settings on the fly, very intuitive.

Similar Products Used:

Canon SD-400, various Olympus digitals

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Apr 12, 2007]
photophorous
Intermediate

Strength:

Image stabilization let's you shoot 2-3 stops slower than otherwise possible.
Big beautiful LCD screen.
Top notch build quality.
Good color and over all image quality.

Weakness:

Small enough to make it difficult to hold but not small (or light) enough for your pocket.
High ISO could be better.
Usable resolution lower than expected for such high pixel count.
Optical viewfinder cuts out too much of the image.

This is a very good camera in many respects, but I'm personally not happy with the compromises that Canon's marketing department chose. You may disagree. Being my first digital point and shoot, after using various digital and film SLRs, I'm holding it to very high standards. This camera seems to be marketed towards photo enthusiasts, not just your average point and shooter, but it's full of compromises that I think will leave many serious photographers dissatisfied.

This camera is a good example of how pixel count does not equate to usable resolution. Maybe I had a bad sample, but I never took any shots that looked sharp at 100% zoom, even in perfect conditions. I don't know if this was a limitation of the lens (doubt it) or a result of heavy noise reduction. It makes me wonder why all those pixels are there if I can't use them. I read in professional reviews that this camera's noise levels are pretty good compared to the competition. If so, I don't think it's enough better to make any practical difference. (If low noise is your top priority, look at the Fuji F30 or a dSLR) See my gallery for a few full size samples at various ISOs.

Manual controls are better than on many p&s cameras, but you still have to use the same dial to adjust shutter speed and aperture, switching between the two with a second button. Why not a second dial? There is an optical viewfinder, which is nice to have, but it cuts out so much of the edges of the picture that you can't frame accurately using it. But it's there, so Marketing can check that off the list.

Exposure is generally good, but clipped highlights are more common than I'm used to. I usually shot with -1/3 exp compensation. Colors are very good. Image Stabilization is also very good...one of the best new features you can get on a digicam. And as I'm sure you've read elsewhere, the build quality of this camera is top notch. Unfortunately, the beautiful LCD screen sticks out further on the back of the camera than any other feature. I never scratched mine, but I would expect it to happen sooner or later.

All in all, I think this camera is very good, but overpriced and not marketed well. It will no doubt take excellent photos when used properly. I just think it could have been so much better if Canon's marketing department would get off the fence and make a compact digital that's really for the photo enthusiast.

Customer Service

not needed

Similar Products Used:

no other compact digitals
Nikon D70s
many film cameras

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[Apr 10, 2007]
robst
Casual

Strength:

Size, portability
Build
Quality of photos
large lcd
I love using it.

Weakness:

None for me

This is only the second digital camera I have owned, the other being a small early model panasonic. I have owned a number of slr film cameras and all the lenses etc that go with it. I was getting tired of carrying all that stuff around so I decided not to buy a digital slr. The cannon g7 was the best option for me as it allows quite a bit of control over the settings. It is still small enough to carry around unobtrusively and still fits in most pockets.
I am impressed with this camera and the quality of photos it can take. I have two batteries for it so I can take quite a few photos without having to charge up again. Another thing I like about this camera is that it takes good quality movies as well. I know it does nor have the RAW format that many more pro photographers would like but that is not an issue for me as I dont really like spending alot of time editing photos in front of a screen.

Similar Products Used:

Panasonic compact digital

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jan 23, 2007]
wild_shot
Professional

Strength:

Outstanding image quality at low ISOs, above average at 400-1600.
very sharp lens ( could be faster than f/2.8, but it's still very good )
IS works very well.
Fantastic build quality, I get a good feeling everytime i handle the camera.
big- bright LCD
easy to navigate menus and settings adjustments
great feature-set within the camera.

and many, many more!!

Weakness:

No RAW support.
Battery meter does not display until battery is low.
No EXIF unless using supplied software ( however it does show up in flickr. )
High priced ( but I got a good deal through Beach camera )

The only other thing that COULD be better would be a faster lens. f/2 would have been nice, like the previous G-series, but it is still a great performer at f/2.8

I bought this camera right after christmas after having tested it out at Calumet, I was so impressed with the build quality that I knew it was just going to be awesome.
I was also impressed with the ability to change preactically every setting on the fly, very reminiscent of my old rangefinders, ( in fact, if you can get your hands on the SC-DC50 leather case it looks like an old rangefinder! heh )
Needless to say, the 10MP quality is definitely apparent, the new DigicIII chip is outstanding, it handles noise remarkably well for a pocket camera.

I took the G7 on my trip to yosemite recently and was never let down once, it continually produced outstanding images with little to no post production.

overall I am very pleased with it, and would whole-heartedly recommend this camera to anyone looking to buy either a back-up, and/or street camera. I feel comfortable in suggesting its use right along-side my 5D and 1DmkII. It now has a permanent place in my camera bag.


If I were to have any negative gripes about it, it would have to be the lack of RAW support, kind of a bummer, because that's simply a firmware addition that should be there. I also am somewhat bothered by the lack of a battery meter, it doesn't show up until your battery is already low. which is a nuisance, but not enough to make me dislike the camera. My last complaint would have to be the fact that the EXIF data does not show up in regular editing programs such as Bridge, Lightroom, or even photoshop. it will ONLY show up in the provided Canon software, which I do not use. Once again, a slight disappointment, but not enough to make me dislike the camera.

Customer Service

I have not had to call for the G7 yet because its still new!

But I have dealt with Canon's service before and they do a great job. very prompt and courteous, especially when in person. ( Irvine center )

Similar Products Used:

I tried out numerous different pocket cameras from all the brands, and the G7 was the only one that stood out as a "usable" street camera to me.

it compliments my 5D and 1DmkII kit very well.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
4
[Nov 16, 2006]
rpkphoto
Professional

Strength:

A sharp, fast F2.8 - F4.8 lens with a 6x optical zoom;
Excellent image stabilization;
10 mp sensor;
Low noise at higher ISOs.
ISO dial on the top of the camera body (very handy);
2.5 inch LCD;
Excellant color rendition and accurate white balance.
No noticeable shutter lag;
Long lasting Li-ion battery.

Weakness:

Lacks RAW capability.

The first thing you notice about this camera - its heft - is one of the best things about it. Weighing in at 13.4 ounces, and with a metal body, it feels more like a screw-mount Leica or a Contax T than most digital point-and-shoot cameras on the market today. Add a 6X optical zoom and image stabilization, and you have a rock-solid platform for making sharp photographs in almost any condition. Overall the best point-and-shoot on the market today (see specific details below). I love using it.

Customer Service

Canon customer service has always been very helpful; I haven't had to send in a camera to them for repair.

Similar Products Used:

I've had several Canon point-and-shoot cameras over the past five years and they have all been solid workhorses. I carry the G7 whenever I don't need to use my Nikon DSLR.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Nov 14, 2006]
jchih212
Intermediate

Strength:

1. Macro shots
2. High res movies
3. Digital+optical zoom feature
4. ND feature
5. ISO3200 is useful for taking night shots

Weakness:

1. ISO3200 can only be taken on M2 res
2. ISO1600 is very noisy
3. Image Stabilizer is sometimes slow on stabilizing
4. Face detection is not useful on moving object

This camera is tends to be a little heavy. It is not recommended for people with wrist issues. Lots of manual and auto features. The manual side has lots mixes for you to play around. The new face detect feature is not that good for moving objects. The macro on this camera is the best to a point one can almost see the molecules of an object. Night shots are still hard to get a noise free image. Blurry occurs a lot during low light environment. Image Stabilizer, some times needs to let it sit for awhile on half way pressed shutter before taking the shot or else blurry will occur. Overall of this camera is great.

Similar Products Used:

Canon S80

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
3
Showing 1-9 of 9  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

photographyreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com