Sigma 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 Asph. Mini Zoom Macro 35mm Zoom
Sigma 28-80mm f/3.5-5.6 Asph. Mini Zoom Macro 35mm Zoom
USER REVIEWS
[Jun 23, 2010]
Tesselator
Expert
Strength:
Close Non-Macro Focusing!
Weakness:
Plastic bayonet mount,
I recently purchased a GH1 and 14 mount adapters to play around on the M43 format. I went to e-bay and purchased a bunch of lenses for $1.00 each. The Sigma 28-80mm 3.5~5.6 Macro Aspherical had a broken or stripped AF mechanism. On the GH1 this is inconsequential. I'd like to remark on this lens's sharpness however! For about $150.00 (new) mini-zoom it's sharpness is relatively remarkable!
Similar Products Used: Many! |
[Jul 04, 2006]
Indra M
Intermediate
Strength:
Practical zoom range.
Weakness:
A bit soft in sharpness, best use at apertures f8 to f16 probably
Looking for a replacement for the rather dull and cheap 35-70mm kit lens I went to the local camera store. My aim was to upgrade that lens while staying in the same zoom range for a budget price. the man who helped me at the store advised me this lens, because for this price you couldn't break a leg. At that time I wasn't a enthousiastic photographer. Actually I purchased the lens new and the type was the mini zoom mark II, but the construction of this lens does not differ from the lens above.
Customer Service No customer service needed for the lens till now.
Similar Products Used: Minolta 35-70mm kit lens
|
[Jan 06, 2006]
kitiongi
Intermediate
Strength:
super sharp almost at all aperture. accurate macro.
Weakness:
not recommended for a manual mode. Im not an avid fan of third party lenses. but when i got the chance to try this lens, it really caught me by surprise! It produces really sharp and ideal for everything from landscapes to close-ups! macro really captures close ups of accuracy, portraits are defined, landscape picture quality is superb!!! I use mostly my canon lens ( 24-70 L but heavy to carry arround for an every day use) which i gave a perfect "10" for its rating in terms of optic quality. But to give you an idea how will i rate this sigma, " 8.5" for its performance. This is a great lens i should say and can sparingly alternate your prime or expenssive lens same with my tamron 70-300 ( great toys to keep!!!) Customer Service none Similar Products Used: canon 70-200 L, canon 24-70 L, canon 50 1.8 mk 1, tamron 70-300 zoom (new toy) |
[Feb 22, 2005]
mbishop
Intermediate
Strength:
Reasonably sharp when stopped down and in perfect lighting conditions. Distortion not so great (od APS-c dSLR). Macro. Price.
Weakness:
Horrible built quality - very shaky, plastic mount and body, feels very cheap. Loose focusing ring. Heavy flare. Very slow and noisy AF. Cheap, plastic lens. Optically acceptable, except for the heavy flare. Built quality is very bad, plastic mount and body and very loose focusing ring make it totally untrustworthy. Nice macro feature though. On the whole, nothing more that a "better kit lens". Collect some money and buy a real one. Customer Service - Similar Products Used: Tamron 28-80 (better than Sigma), Minolta 28-85 3,5-4,5 (great lens) |
[Nov 26, 2004]
SF Rebeldude
Beginner
Strength:
1:2 Macro, Veratility, Price, Excellent quality as compared to price. Aspherical.
Weakness:
Plastic feel. purchased this lens in a kit package along with a Canon EOS Rebel Ti and a Sigma 100-300mm AF DL Telephoto Zoom for $299.95. I feel I got a great deal. This is an excellent and very versatile kit lens. I love the macro feature. As a matter of fact this lens got me into the excitement of photographing close up pictures of flowers. I have now purchased a Sigma 50mm EX Macro and a Sigma 105mm EX Macro for true 1:1 Reproduction. Customer Service Sigma Customer Support via email has been very good. Similar Products Used: Canon EF 28-200mm AF USM, Sigma 100-300mm AF DL Telephoto Zoom, Sigma 55-200mm AF Zoom, Tamron 19-35mm Wide Angle Zoom, Sigma 50mm EX Macro (Prime), Sigma 105mm EX Macro (Prime). |
[Feb 14, 2003]
hovi
Intermediate
Strength:
Price Zoom range
Weakness:
Too short of a lens for macro work and looses image quality at this point. A nice compact lens for a cheap price. This was the first lens that I bought around 5 years ago when I first started photography. The zoom range is good but the f-stops will limit you shooting during morning and dusk. The lens needs to be shot at f11 to get the best results and the marco feature is nice. The problem with the macro is that you get too close to your subject because the lens is only 80mm and causes shadows and you get too much background. Customer Service N/A Similar Products Used: Nikkor 24-120mm |
[Oct 04, 2002]
Terrapin
Casual
Strength:
Relatively sharp for the price. Decent construction. Another competent, if uninspired, Sigma product.
Weakness:
Very slow lens, but you get what you pay for. If you can get enough light, this mini-zoom will produce reasonably good results. Of course, it's real slow, so you can forget low-light and some natural light shots. Construction seems decent enough, pretty sturdy (and I beat the hell out of this thing too). |
[May 25, 2002]
Fred-M
Expert
Strength:
The most obvious is the 1:2 macro at 80mm. I don't notice in loss of sharpness and none of the usual spherical aberration commonly found at such magnification ratios. Flare ( a big hang-up of mine) in negligible, even at critical angles to the sun. Overall image quality is quite acceptable, particularly at this price. I was expecting a plastic lens flange, but this one's metal.
Weakness:
None you wouldn't expect-not made for heavy use, but overall operation is fairly smooth. Focusing, as with most AF zooms, is under-damped, but no worse than any others I've seen. If you want best sharpness, keep it in the "sweet" zone of two stops down from max. aperture in it does a creditable job. If the price seems unbelievable, let me emphasize it was packaged with a Maxxum XTsi body (also reviewed) and that was the price Samy's showed on the receipt. This is not a "refurb" but a new lens with USA warranty. Customer Service Not required yet Similar Products Used: Maxxum 28-85 Canon EF 28-105 |
[Feb 28, 2002]
Bill50
Intermediate
Strength:
cheap (don''t care what happens to it-no worries) lightweight macro function sharp, but probably wouldn''t compete with a prime lens
Weakness:
that stupid focus ring is much too loose in manual focus!!!!!!! feels like a toy This is the lens I started with to use on my first Nikon. it is reasonably sharp in all occasions it''s been used for. Have not done a sophisticated test of sharpness at each f stop, but I have never noticed any unacceptable photos with it. In time I''ve upgraded to better lenses,but I still find myself using it quite a bit. This is because 28-80 seems to be the most useful focal length for me.The Sigma 20mm is too wide most of the time. The Nikon 50 is my favorite, but many times I need something a little longer or a little wider. It''s not a fast lens at all, handheld shots in low light are just about of the question. The thing I hate about this one is focus ring is so loose,manual focus is a big headache! Customer Service not needed yet Similar Products Used: no other zooms of this range |
[Jan 23, 2002]
desmosome_2000
Intermediate
Strength:
Macro facility Accurate AF with macro applied. Weight.
Weakness:
At a push, I would say loose focus ring, but really at this price, who is complaining! This lens is ideal for everything from landscapes to close-ups! Very popular zoom ranges, and the macro facility allows close ups of accuracy, when documenting flowers, grass etc. I bought this one second hand and in perfect condition. Its not to heavy, and although the focus ring is quite loose, lets face it, you get what you pay for. It really functions well with AF, making it ideal for the biginner or casual photographer. Portraits are well defined, landscape picture quality has made me a fortune, and close up is ideal for my ecology studies. Well done Sigm Customer Service None needed. Similar Products Used: Pentax 35 - 70mm |