Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G VR IF-ED 35mm Zoom
Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G VR IF-ED 35mm Zoom
USER REVIEWS
[Apr 01, 2010]
Raymond
Intermediate
I agree with the lens creep issue.
|
[Feb 15, 2010]
Rabid_Clam
Casual
Strength:
Very versitile lens with both automatic and manual settings available for any shot one could want to make. Has vibration reduction to assist in clear images. Over all is a highly recommended lens for any AF compatable Nikon camera body.
Weakness:
This model has an inherent issue of lens creep where if you are carrying this lens with the front pointed down the lens will fully expand to full extent. Lens will not lock in position. Over all this is totally unacceptable. Nikon no longer manufactures this model because of this problem, the new one has a lock to prevent or retard creep. Nikon agreed with m y complaint and at this time they are repairind the lens at their expense uncer warranty.
Great all 'round lens for both amature and pro. Fits a wide variety of Nikn pro bocies. Does not work with tele-converter. Compact lens easily transported. Has extreme wide variety of frames to create an excellent shot of most any subject near and far. Great quality lens. Is a perfect lens to take on a vacation where only one lens will fit almost any occassion. The 18mm wide angle is not as wide as what I needed but it is excellent for what it does. I did add a second lens, the Nikon 10-24mm wide angle lens which makes my set almost complete.
Customer Service Customer service were excellent. They offered a NO hassle program to repair this warranty issue. Where parts have to come from Japan there is a very long lag time of 2 to 3 weeks just to get parts so adding freight-in time with examination time then the long wait for parts and then repair and freight out a simple repair could take up to or over 5 weeks. Nikon does not stock repair parts, they are made and shipped for eah submission. But customer service is excellent otherwise and done with top notch professionalism. Similar Products Used: Have used Tameron lenses in the 35mm days. |
[Jan 05, 2010]
armando_m
Intermediate
Strength:
Wide zoom range
Weakness:
Heavy
I use this lens with a Nikon D40, it was purchased shortly after the D40. Iin comparison with the kit lens (in the same focal length range), contrast and color is very very good, the main difference is VR. And what a difference! VR helps a lot in low light situations. AF-S works very well, focusing quickly and only gets confused vs a large area with no contrast. After carrying the camera for a long time it does get heavy, I like to carry it by holding the lens rather than having the camera strap on my neck. A small annoyance, the zoom barrel will slide up or down if shooting in nearly vertical angles, this can be a problem if the camera is on a tripod, also the zoom extends by itself also when carrying the camera in near vertical angles. Be careful with the M/A focus switch, I have forgotten many times to set it back to auto, specially if your are shooting in manual focus and at 18mm it is difficult to see on the camera viewer that the photos are slightly blurry. When using a tripod the manual says to turn VR off, I have shoot with a tripod leaving VR both on and off and noticed no difference.
Similar Products Used: Tamron 28-200mm on a film 35mm SLR |
[Aug 31, 2009]
Mel_Snyder
Professional
Strength:
One lens for most outdoor situations - even sports, if the light is good enough
Weakness:
VR is good, but can't compensate for poor technique
This lens is rather amazing for its range, and the ability to handle a diverse range of situations. It's in no way competitive in quality to primes, or even more limited-range zooms.
Customer Service Unknown Similar Products Used: None as "amateur" - mostly pro lenses like Nikon f2.8 80-200 AF-D |
[Jun 04, 2009]
SanPasqual
Intermediate
Strength:
Broad range of focal lengths - like having 1 good and 1-2 mediocre lenses in one.
Weakness:
Distortion over a range of focal lengths.
I have a mixed impression about the 18-200mm lens. The lens is definitely multi-purpose, but said capability comes with a cost in performance. Lens distortion is a big problem with the lens; the broad range of focal lengths, compact size, and light weight will compromise image integrity. The lens readily slips in focal length, aqnd that is a design problem that Nikon did not have resolved when my lens was built. In general, the lens has a flimsy "feel" about it; for comparison, the 35-135mm was a work of art and very well built without the aforementioned lens slippage. VR is a big plus and works well; however, the lens does not resolve with high image clarity / sharpness above around 130-140mm. In fact, images appear to be quite soft. There are better values in used lenses and for less as long as one is willing to dispense with VR. This lens is crippled by its limitation to DX, which limits use to 1 of 2 Nikons that I own. This is one lens that I may sell sooner rather than later as it is a so-so lens and will be less important as FX sensor-bearing cameras become more prevalent. Customer Service Depends - some techs are great and some are not. Similar Products Used: Nikon 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 AF-D
|
[Apr 13, 2009]
galton
Intermediate
Strength:
Awesome range, good performance, price is not cheap but more than reasonable. Really, the only serious complaint about this lens is that it doesn't actually do EVERYTHING. That said, this is one of the best go-to lenses for most uses you can find.
Weakness:
Serious issues:
Not the actual Holy Grail. Far better than your average lens, however, and may replace most other lenses for most users. If you're heading out the door and don't know what you need, this is probably it. It will not, however, replace your campstove nor cook you breakfast in the morning.
Customer Service Not needed. Similar Products Used: Most lenses are similar in that they cover the same uses. My comments here are intended to point out where this lens doesn't cut it - and you may want to have a different lens handy. I have used all of these: but this is still the lens I use most frequently.
|
[Jan 19, 2009]
Biezel
Intermediate
Strength:
Zoomrange, colourrendition, weight, fast AF and VR.
Weakness:
To soft for the D200, distortion and awfull ca's. After reading lots of raving reviews, I bought one for our Scotland trip last year.
Customer Service It's fast and good. Used it twice.
|
[May 19, 2008]
kay Shumway
Intermediate
Strength:
The VR function works really well
Weakness:
None.
I was fortunate to be able to buy the 18-200 lens before we took a trip to Scotland. I lugged two other lenses along , a 70-300 VR lens and a 105 mm lens and never used them The lens stayed on my camera the whole time. It is sharp at 200 and wonderful for close ups of people at 18. I was unable to bring a tripod because of the weight and never missed it. I have a 70-200 lens which I love. It cannot be used without a tripod but it is 2.8 which allows more picture taking in low light. The f3.5 is close enough for me for travelling and indoor pictures. It is a great addition to my lenses. It focuses quickly and gives sharp images all the time. I even took some decent pictures from a moving train. I will keep it on my camera most of the time, except when I am taking nature shots with the tripod. I think this lens is a great starter lens. I wish I had had it when I bought my first Nikon camera. Customer Service I haven't needed any yet or ever. Similar Products Used: I have a nikon D80 with a 70-300 VR lens
|
[Mar 24, 2008]
Grandpaw
Intermediate
Strength:
Compact
I have purchased the Nikon D80 with a 18-200VR Nikon zoom lens. The lens is slightly larger that the 18-135 but has a stronger telephoto and the Vibration Reduction that is very helpful when shooting at slower shutter speeds in less that perfect lighting conditions.
Customer Service NA |
[Nov 26, 2007]
Mule
Intermediate
Strength:
It captures enough wide angle that it will cover many indoor needs. The zoom to 200 is sufficient for a lot of daily use. It is lightweight and compact so if you are making that hike and don't want a lot of equipment, this is a good choice.
Weakness:
I suppose I could say that the aperture isn't large enough for some settings but it would be a bit of an unfair criticism for this price point. First a bit about the reviewer... I shot a lot of 35 mm from the late 70's to late 80's. I shot for a newspaper and college. I took off about 20 years and just re-entered the digital scene.
|