Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM 35mm Zoom
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM 35mm Zoom
USER REVIEWS
[Jul 11, 2013]
Leo
Expert
Strength:
Very nice relative small and light walk around lens with perfect range on FF. If you chose one (zoom)lens to take along this is maybe the one. IS is nice.
Weakness:
Nothing special, F4.0 but that why it is small and light. Construction failure, my copy creeps like mad. I put an elastic string around the zoomring, that helps. But a lock would have been nice. I bought this zoom in 2005. I did not like the 24-70 F2.8 to walk around. To big.
|
[Mar 25, 2013]
Jon Lloyd
Intermediate
Strength:
Well suited to a full frame sensor
Weakness:
No real weakness in my view as it does what is is designed to do.
I bought this lens with a 7D body... OK as a "kit lens" but I don't like that term as it cheapens what is in actual fact a solid pro quality lens. It performed well for me on the 7D for over 12 months in a variety of situations and has been a solid walk-around lens.
|
[Nov 09, 2012]
Howard Wu
Expert
Strength:
Sharpness
Weakness:
Vignetting at 24mm I've had 2 copies of this lens. The 24-105 is a fantastic range for general purpose photography, and I do not need large aperture often (although for some interior shots I wish it was f/2.8 but I guess you can't have everything), so this is a dream lens on paper.
Similar Products Used: Canon EF 17-40 L USM, Canon 28-135 IS |
[Jun 22, 2012]
Dave Perkes
Professional
Strength:
Good build quality with constant aperture and some degree of weather sealing. Its a good general purpose lens with IS which makes it very useful for video.
Weakness:
Wide angle distortion and vignetting at 24mm is disappointing.
It was bought as a a kit with a 5D Mk2. Its a well built prosumer lens and should last for decades; but have not been too impressed overall with this the Image quality of this lens. Distortion at the wide end and excessive vignetting require post processing to remove. The bokeh is not that good; being harsh with back- lit highlights
Similar Products Used: Sigma 17-70 DX for Nikon
|
[Jan 06, 2011]
rechitansorin
Intermediate
Strength:
Excellent quality of the materials (although the inner lens support is made of plastic), tropicalisation (i had never had dust particles inside the lens), constant f 4 aperture but most of all, it s versatility.
Weakness:
The optical performance is good but nothing to dream of. Especially towards the long focal length, where even stopping down, the contrast and contrast are weak for it s claims. The distortion is very strong at 24mm (straight lines in the upper or downer side of the photograph will show a disturbing curvature (can be corrected via appropiate softs). A very good allround package. Similar Products Used: Canon EF 28-105mm f 3,5-4,5
|
[Oct 18, 2010]
Archangel
Expert
Strength:
OK, the goods: Its optically excellent. Outside, on a sunny day, the images cannot be beat. Clear, vivid, decent zoom range. Build quality is excellent. Its an "L" after all.
Weakness:
Now the bads: The F4 aperture. I wasn't thrilled with this fact when I bought it, but thought I could work through it. With the excellent image stabilization I thought it would be no issue. I was wrong. I have consistently been let down by the poor low light performance of this lens. Add on the fact that I often use a polarizer, and you can imagine the challenges an f/4 gives you. With any moving subject you will have plenty of blur, and indoors the lens is a poor choice. My 70-200 with the f/2.8 is FAR superior in limited light.
Was a bit disappointed with this lens. I bought this as the "walkaround" lens for my EOS 7D. As it stands, i am considering getting the Canon EF-S Zoom 17 MM-55 MM Lens as a secondary "walkaround", defeating the purpose of getting this expensive L series lens in the first place. Similar Products Used: Overall it is is a good lens for outdoor walkaround, and if you can live with the poor low light performance, and limited wideangle aspect on 1.6x bodies, you will love the images you get, If you are looking at this as an all in one, indoor/outdoor lens, it will disappoint. |
[Jul 20, 2010]
EOSThree
Intermediate
Strength:
Sharp: this lens is sharp in the center, very much so in a lot of instances. The sharpness falls off a bit toward the edges but this is still a very sharp lens. Contrast: excellent contrast, great contrast will alone do a lot to make your photographs better. You could add it in post, but having it there in the beginning is much better than having to add it. Color: very faithful color, I have never noticed any color cast with this lens. Constant f/4 aperture, it's wonderful not to have to worry that your aperture is getting smaller as you zoom in. L build: This lens is solid. It's very well built and should be trouble free for years. Range: this is an excellent range on a full frame camera, wide to short telephoto. Very versatile.
Weakness:
Vignetting: this lens is prone to vignetting at wide apertures. Light fall off is fairly significant. Soft toward the edges: This lens loses it's sharpness toward the edges of the frame, is very sharp in the center but falls off to good near the edges. Distortion: at 24mm the barrel distortion is quite pronounced. If you shoot a straight line at 24mm it will be decidedly curved in the photo. At 105mm there is slight pincushion, but it's hardly noticeable. The middle ranges of this lens are distortion free. Awkward range on a crop body: 36-157.5mm, not really wide, almost normal starting point. This is a good solid lens. This lens was introduced as the kit lens with the 5D, it works very well on a full frame body, and is maybe a little bit awkward on a crop body. The 24-105 is a reasonably sharp constant aperture (f/4) lens with a robust build, and image stabilization (IS). The range combined with IS and L quality make this one of Canon's most popular lenses. Customer Service Haven't needed it...ever. Similar Products Used: Canon 28-70 f/2.8L, Canon 28-135 f/3.5-5.6. |
[Jan 05, 2008]
mike4
Professional
Strength:
The strenth is the price and extra zoom up to 105mm and Images Stabilizer.
Weakness:
It is not as good as the 24-70mm f2.8 L lens because it has the wide apeture of f2.8 which you can use in low light and does give better picture. But the 24-105mm F4 L lens means that the F4, you have to use the Image Stabilizer in low light but still get blur images and you have to use a flash like the 580 EX I or II to get a good shot. You have to increase the ISO setting from 400 or 800 to 1000 to 1600 to shoot in low light or indoor and at 24 mm a small distorstion but not a real problem, the picture are still good. When it comes to zooming to 105mm the lens barrel extend outwards which means that dust can get in. Meaning cost money to get it clean on an L serise lens. So no internal zoom or better seal to stop dust getting in. The Canon 24-105mm F4 I.S. L lens is very good to use with the EOS 1D Mark III.
Customer Service Good customer service at Canon Australia Similar Products Used: 28-135mm I.S. Lens |
[Dec 01, 2007]
DerekS
Intermediate
Strength:
? A Canon product
Weakness:
Have not noticed any till now. Having a penchant for constant aperture lenses having used Nikon, Sigma and Tamron lenses with an aperture ranging between f/1.8, f/2.8 with my Nikon film based cameras, I was shopping for a SIGMA 24-70mm f/2.8 EX DG Lens for my Canon EOS 5D. No one had the SIGMA or even the TAMRON 28-75mm f/2.8 Di in stock, both which cost around 50% less than the CANON EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM.
Customer Service None needed so far. Would I? Similar Products Used: Have never used Canon lenses before. This is the first Canon lens I'm using. |
[May 10, 2007]
jackthehat.co.uk
Expert
Strength:
Image quality
Weakness:
Just a tad heavy for an f4 optic
I got this lens for my 350D after many weeks of tossing up between this lens and the 17-40 f4.0L. This lens works out the same as a 38-168mm lens in 35mm terms so I was little worried that I would find the 38mm end a little restricting on the 350D. Surprisingly I find it perfectly OK. The maximum reach of 40mm on the 17-40 was really going to get on my nerves but with 105mm on this lens the possibilities are endless. It's a perfect lens for travel and street photography and will be especially good on the full frame Canon SLRs. I was a little surprised at the size and weight of the lens especially as it is only f4 and not f2.8. It's quite a big heavy beast and looks a little out of place on the tiny 350D. I think it would sit much better on a 30D or a 5D but it isn't a problem. If you're upgrading from the standard 18-55 kit lens then you will notice a huge difference in size and weight but this is only to be expected really. The exterior of the lens is mostly metal and the build quality is even better than expected. It probably couldn't have been built any better. I also own the 70-200mm f2.8L IS and the build quality is equally good. The front of this lens extends when zooming in and out unlike some of the other L series zooms. I don't really find this a problem. Others will be pleased to know that the front of the lens does not rotate or move in or out during focussing making using filters easier. Incidentally, the filter thread is 77mm which is good as its one of the more popular sizes so prices won't be too stupid. The zoom and focus rings are superbly smooth and you can focus manually without switching off AF on the lens barrel. The zoom does not creep when pointing the camera down like some cheaper consumer lenses. The IS system is a bonus with this lens and probably goes some way to explaining why the lens is heavy. Hand held shots at 1/4 of a second are actually possible if you take care! I don't find IS as useful on a lens of this focal length... on the 70-200mm it is a Godsend as I hate tripods. On this lens it should be seen as a bonus that can be used in emergencies. Interestingly the IS only has one mode unlike the 70-200 which has 2 modes (one for panning shots, one for static subjects).
Customer Service Not needed (yet) Similar Products Used: Canon 18-55mm EF-S
|