Sunpak 120J/TTL Flashes
Sunpak 120J/TTL Flashes
USER REVIEWS
[Apr 28, 2011]
sparklephoto757
Professional
Strength:
Light weight , fast recycle time , easy on power ,versitile , Never been in the shop after 4 years
Weakness:
none if you know how to take care of your equipment I puchased this item for wedding photography . I shot my first wedding and have not look back . I power it with Quantum turbo which last me all day . the light from my sunpak 120 jttl on my Nikon D200 is unreal . Here's some infomation . I use Paul C Buff cyber Sync to trigger the light on a justrite bracket this bracket standa by itself . Here's something else I love about this unit it takes AA batteries and the Q Flash dont . If you are into strobist photography this is the right flash , Check this out they are selling 60 cm portable softbox for about $45.00 on ebay and you can use 120jttl as a studio strob outside the pictures come out great . I use a Nikon 80-200 2.8 lens on a mono pod with Cyber Sync to fire them .
Customer Service NEVER BEEN IN THE SHOP Similar Products Used: Nikon SB800 SB600 SB28 SUNPAK 522 SUNPAK 544 SUNPAK 622 |
[Sep 17, 2008]
Mike B
Professional
Strength:
Like every Sunpak legend, it's as reliable as Grandma's apple pie!
Weakness:
None. I'll never forget the elation stumbling across the 120J while looking for a portable sysrem. At the time, the Broncolor Mobil hed just been released and for more than 5000 GBP, I could have a battery and a couple of heads. I looked at the 120j thinking, it's the same thing! only better, it's lighter, I can replace the batteries as many times as I need uring a shoot and the reflector is in fact bigger. It may not be the most robust piece of kit out there, but then I'm not a combat photographer.
Customer Service Never had a problem Similar Products Used: Similar? you must be kidding. |
[Jul 30, 2006]
Jeff
Professional
Strength:
Excellent light quality. Light weight (by comparison to Quantum). Works on a variety of battery packs or 4 AA batteries. Excellent price. Just compare it to any other Parabolic reflector flash on the market (i.e. Lumedyne, Norman, Quantum, etc.) So, don't expect a $1000.00+ flash for $200.00 and you won't be disapointed!
Weakness:
The flash head may swivel on you when you don't expect it to. Just check it's alignment befoire you shoot. I agree with many of the above appraisals. I also own the Quantum T4D which does appear to be a far better built unit. However, I have used the Sunpak for over two years prior to purchasing the Quantum and, although it did feel somewhat weak, I never had any problem as far as damage is concerned. Yes, you do have to keep your eye on it so that it doesn't swivel on you. But, it's about about 1/5 the price of the Quantum and produces the same light! I had to return my Quantum for repair within the first year (they handled it quickly, no complaints) but sometimes looks, and feels, are deceiving. Never had to put the Sunpak in the shop!
Similar Products Used: Quantum T4D |
[Jul 23, 2000]
Allan Najjar
Professional
Strength:
Flash Head very versatile, compatible with Quantum's accessories. Parabolic head provides soft(er) lighting than most units. I have the non-TTL version-the AC to PC connection is very reliable. Can be powered off 4 AAs, which I sometimes prefer over the NICAD pack.
Weakness:
Construction/ruggedness is marginal. Detents in head are too weak. Quick movements can swivel the head-I have to keep an eye on this. Very versatile flash. Ruggedness could be beefed up. Customer Service NA Similar Products Used: Metz 45CT3, Vivitar 283,285, Sunpak 433 |
[Jul 20, 2000]
Richard Thomas
Expert
Strength:
Very nice lighting, many battery/power options available, powerful.
Weakness:
VERY awkward, even with a heavy-duty flash bracket. Easy to damage the tube, I'm sure, although I never had that experience personally. It is replacable but at $30 a tube... I would prefer this flash unit if it was a little more solid and had some protection for the tube. As it is, I sold mine after three months. Customer Service never used it Similar Products Used: Vivitar, Metz flashes |
[Jan 14, 2000]
Alan Arseneault
Professional
Model Reviewed:
120JTTL
Strength:
Sorry, nothing good to report.
Weakness:
Very problematic. Detents on flash head are too weak, causing head to drop from the bounce positions. Never would fire consistently. Sent on two occasions to service with no improvement. Overall build quality far too insufficient for pro work. Not a suitable flash for a professional, to whom this unit is marketed. Poor value. Customer Service Very poor. Service was completely uninterested in making this unit right. Similar Products Used: Metz 45, Vivitar 285, Vivitar 283 |
[Sep 15, 2000]
Kenneth Brown
Professional
Strength:
None
Weakness:
triggering system is suspect, very hard on batteries, bounce and swivel is too delicate (easy to move - detents should be stronger) When this unit works, it does a reasonable job, but it is too flimsy and unreliable for serious professional work. I would recommend a bare bulb flash for all serious people photographers, but I cannot recommend this one - it's just too unreliable. Customer Service In Canada (excellent)but the fix doesn't last long - service tells me it's an inherit flaw. Similar Products Used: No other bare bulb system. |
[Feb 08, 2001]
David Bindle
Professional
Strength:
Powerfull, reflector light nice, ability to use bare bulb, fast recycling with TRPAKIIa
Weakness:
Seems a bit flimsy, hope I don't develope weak detent problems with swivel and tilt... I've gone from a conventional flash, 380ex, 430ez, 550ex to now using the 120JTTL with my Canon system. Wow... the quality of light is really quite an improvment. And when I can utilize a low white ceiling and walls... the bare bulb is fantastic. I've only just started using it for weddings, but so far the results are great. Customer Service Not had to ... yet. Similar Products Used: None - but for the price and TTL AF features... it's kind of unique |