Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 35mm Primes
Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 35mm Primes
USER REVIEWS
[Apr 03, 2013]
joecap
Expert
Strength:
Small, handles flair well
Weakness:
soft edges, outclassed by ef 28-105mm and ef 22-55mm I bought this lens assuming it would be an upgrade from my EF28-105 and 28-200mm tamron xr.
Similar Products Used: ef 28-105mm, ef 22-55mm |
[May 06, 2008]
jim
Intermediate
Strength:
Sharpness
Weakness:
Hunts a bit in AF
I purchased a MK I version of this lens, have not seen the MK II but apparently it does not have the metal mount that this one does.
Customer Service NA Similar Products Used: canon 50mm f1.8 |
[Nov 19, 2007]
ganiyu
Intermediate
Strength:
Light and extremely portable. It's not an attention seeker.
Weakness:
Focus ring. I have a few lenses but i use this one allot for portraits and for the price it's amazing. http://www.contactphotographer.co.uk Similar Products Used: 50mm f1.8 |
[Sep 27, 2007]
rghoag
Intermediate
On my 400d this is like walking around with a 45mm lens on a 35, The noise does
Similar Products Used: 17-85 canon usm is |
[Oct 31, 2006]
Kyle W. Smith
Intermediate
Strength:
Decently fast at 2.8
Weakness:
Noisy AF
Prior to purchasing this lens I was using the Canon 20mm 2.8 USM and was generally unpleased with the resulys. The lens was very soft wide open and I felt I should have gotten more out of a lens of that price. I wanted to free up some cash to purchase some other equipment so I sold the 20mm and bought the 28mm 2.8 instead. Aside from not being as wide, I think the performance of this lens is just as good, if not better than the 20mm. It can be a little soft wife open, but not too bad. Very sharp when stopped down. The AF is quite noisy, but about the same as a Nikon 50mm 1.8d I use to have. all in all I'm pleased with this lens and It exceeds any zoom of an equivilent price or more. The lens hood is a piece of crap, but serves its purpose. I would definitley reccommend this lens to anyone on a budget. If you're on a budget it would go along nicely with the 50mm 1.8. Customer Service N/A Similar Products Used: Nikon 50mm 1.8D
|
[Jul 02, 2006]
mike13
Intermediate
Strength:
Excellent image
Weakness:
Not USM
I am a great fan of (expensive) PRIME lenses having owned and used them often during the 1980’s when I was mad keen, so in a way this is my first experience of a ‘cheapie’ EF lens.
Customer Service Great buy from E Bay - excellent seller, cheap price.. Similar Products Used: Nikon 28 f2.8 Nikkor Ai-s
|
[Jan 01, 2006]
dajon
Expert
Strength:
compact and sharp with no distortion
Weakness:
focus ring is small and not very smooth Well made lens that is very sharp at all apertures. Focus ring is abit small and not too smooth .but hey you get more than you pay for: sharp and no distortion....much bether than most zooms. |
[Aug 22, 2003]
Rollins
Expert
Strength:
Very sharp lens! The center is always sharp and edges very good f/5.6 and up. No visible distortion. Build quality is good -- at least for the price. Metal lens mount. Light weight and balances nice. AF is quick -- although, not USM. But at this focal length, USM is not necessary (save the money). Excellent Price/Performance ratio!
Weakness:
Nothing that I can think of. This lens is very sharp at center at all aperatures. The corners are good at f/2-4 and become very good at f/5.6-f/16. Distortion is very well controlled. I frequently have straight edges at the corners of the frame and see no distrotion at all. This lens is best used at f/8 as observed from my slide tests. This lens is an excellent buy! Customer Service None. Similar Products Used: Canon EF 20mm, 24-TS, 35mm f/2, 50mm f/2.5 Macro, 70-200 f/4 L, 300mm f/4 L |
[Jul 29, 2003]
pemartin
Intermediate
Strength:
sharpness size common filters shared hood with 35mm VALUE!
Weakness:
old fashioned AF- not bad, just a bit louder would be nice w/ FTM, but at least the focus ring disingages w/ AF I purchased this lens at a great price as a barely used item. I was seeking to gain some added sharpness at the wide end compared to my 28-105. After looking over some shots I took recently on Fuji Reala 100, I think this lens is definatly a step up from the zoom. Since it is a prime lens you would expect increased sharpness, but I also found the color rendition to be improved as well. It performed so well that I sold off my 28-105, which I thought was a pretty good lens. It also is very compact and light, and makes packing it along very easy. I have no problem with the build of this lens, it is much better than the 50mm 1.8II- not quite up to the 24mm 2.8 though. It also shares the same filters as my above mentioned 50 as well as my 35mm lens (and hood w/ 35). Overall I am very satisfied with this lens, especially considering the small amount of money spent. Along with the 50 1.8 this lens is almost a must have for landscapers. Customer Service not needed Similar Products Used: 28-105 3.5-4.5 24mm 2.8 35mm 2.0 50mm 1.8II 70- 200 4L |
[May 18, 2003]
Mike2000
Expert
Strength:
- Sharp - No flare even without the hood - Contrast - Color rendition - Weight
Weakness:
- Lack USM and FTM (but it's an old lens from 80's!) - Plastic feeling - No hood included A very good piece of equipment at a low price. A must have in every bag imho especially if you find it used. No flare also without hood and contrast and sharpness are wonderful. |